EDLP

Your clearest conviction, by far, is justice: you backed the Leveson-style recovery plan, legal aid, and education-first prison reform without hesitation — a rehabilitative, systems-fixing instinct. Everywhere else you're a pragmatist first: deport foreign nationals convicted of serious crime, but keep the ECHR; scrap net zero's 2050 target, but keep Britain's nuclear deterrent and back sanctioning Russia hard. This isn't a coalition of causes — it's someone who asks "does this actually work?" before asking which side it flatters.

You split almost evenly with the national mood — agreeing on Russia, deportation and immigration reduction, breaking from it on cannabis, the death penalty and leaving the ECHR, where the country leaned one way and you held firm the other. You're not a contrarian; you're just unmoved by momentum when a principle's at stake, as with your vote against scrapping the GLA and Mayor of London while most of the country's respondents in that split leaned narrowly against too.

You've never voted on housing, the economy, energy, education or the constitution — a striking gap for someone this fluent on justice and rights, and it means your wider worldview is still mostly a sketch.

Seven scored votes is early days — enough to see the shape of a rehabilitation-minded realist, not yet enough to call the whole picture. Cast a few more, especially on the economy or housing, and next week's profile will start telling you something sharper than you could tell yourself.