ERR

You want a more disciplined UK — controlled migration, welfare scrutiny and fiscal responsibility — but with strong civil rights, constitutional safeguards and room for plural identities. Your record is still relatively young, yet its clearest instinct is already visible: you are not a conventional conservative; you resist restriction when it becomes coercion, and resist liberalism when it becomes complacent.

You were The Cautious Restrictionist; now you look more like a Rights-First Crossbencher. The immigration instinct has held, but it has been joined by opposition to compulsory loss of citizenship, support for rejoining the EU, a codified constitution and refusal to void the votes of people without jobs.

You are almost perfectly split from the national mood, siding with the UK majority on 19 of 32 votes. The sharpest tension is that you backed welfare transparency and serious-offender bans while rejecting tighter citizenship rules and voting rights — a welfare brake, not a broad authoritarian turn.

You barely run with your circle, agreeing with its Centre-leaning accounts only just over half the time. ArcturusSnow is your closest ally, though Rights divide you; Moomin is the biggest clash, suggesting your independence matters more than tribal alignment.

The open question is whether your right-leaning economics and immigration stance will consolidate, or remain subordinate to your instinct for rights and institutional pluralism. Ten more votes will sharpen that answer — and make this living picture truer.

Eight votes in, and one thing is already unmistakable: you want net migration down, and you don't hedge about it — you backed reversing the demographic drift and cutting migration below record levels without blinking. Everywhere else you're less predictable — you'd rather see power pushed out to every postcode than kept in Westminster, and you passed on the government's "traditional values" campaign, which most of the country happily voted for.

You're not a reflexive majority-rider — you split evenly with the nation, siding with it on housing and migration but breaking away on energy contracts, school lunches, and — most sharply — on devolving Budget power, where you were nearly alone in a country that voted 4-to-1 against it.

There isn't a circle to measure yet — no one you follow has enough shared votes with you to call an ally or a clash. That comparison is one of the first things this profile will fill in.

Four scored votes is a sketch, not a portrait — enough to say you lean right and mean it on immigration, not enough to call you anything sharper yet. The picture firms up fast from here.

Tomorrow's ballot of eight lands, and this whole read gets rewritten against it — sharper, less thin, closer to the real you.