JamesTuck

You vote for a Britain that tightens welfare, expands nuclear power and the deterrent, cuts stamp duty for downsizing pensioners, and keeps tuition fees standing — a tight-fisted, patriotic economy. But hand you a knife-crime bill and you flinch: no to whole-life sentences, no to the death penalty, no to stripping judges of discretion, yes to fundamentally reforming prisons. It's not softness, it's a conviction that punishment should rehabilitate, not just warehouse.

You split with the country almost exactly down the middle, which hides how sharply you diverge on the votes that matter. You backed faith-school funding when barely a third of Britain did, and cheered building on greenbelt farmland when fewer than a third agreed — you'll take the unpopular side when it fits a plan-led, growth-first instinct, even as you side with the crowd on nuclear power and the deterrent.

You follow a group that leans Centre Left overall, and it shows: you agree with them under half the time. KyleSinclair is your one real anchor — lockstep on Rights, seven agreements in ten — while TornDarkness is a near-constant friction, aligned only on Rights but pulling apart hard on Economy and Defence. You're not running with your circle here; you're voting past it.

This is an early sketch of a distinctive voter — the Justice-vs-everything-else tension is the thread worth watching. Cast a few more votes and the next read will tell you whether that clemency streak holds or bends under the weight of the rest of your record.