JoM

You want a Britain where the state owns the big things — steel, energy, the nuclear question — and pays for itself by taxing wealth over work; strongly left on welfare, energy and governance is your bedrock. But this isn't softness: you'll ban extremist parties, back deportation of foreign offenders, and support the burka ban, showing a state-first left that doesn't flinch from using power hard when it wants to.

You were "The Media Suspicion Loyalist" — distrusting concentrated power, thin on record. That instinct hasn't vanished (Lords reform, banning extremist parties) but it's now filled out into something bigger: a genuinely left economic spine plus real hawkishness on deportation, extremism and the burka. You've gone from a suspicious observer to someone with an actual governing programme.

You mostly run with the country — nationalising steel, the deterrent, banning by-election dodgers — but you break hard against the grain on North Sea licences, whole-life sentences, and nuclear expansion, where big majorities went the other way and you didn't follow.

You track your Centre Left circle at a middling clip — agreeing little more than six times in ten. robvrn is your closest read, especially on governance; hopadidida is where you keep splitting, suggesting your welfare-and-order combination doesn't map neatly onto anyone else's script.

Your record is filling in fast — defence, constitution and foreign policy have real shape now where they were blank before. Cast a few more and the sharper contradictions — deportation hawk, energy nationaliser — will start telling an even clearer story; next week's read will be truer than this one.

You're a voter for whom institutional power is the enemy, not government itself: you want public utilities in public hands, media barons checked, and prisoners given a route back rather than left to rot. Your Britain is one where the establishment — press or corporate — answers to ordinary people.

On most things you run with the country — sanctions on Russia, faster grant processing, PIP reform. But on prisoner release you back the scheme with only a third of the nation agreeing, and on Mo Farah's knighthood you're firmly protective while 4 in 10 wanted it stripped. Those two votes alone mark you as someone willing to hold an unpopular line when it fits your convictions.

No local data has come through yet on your votes — an open thread rather than a verdict. As soon as your area weighs in, this becomes one of the sharpest parts of your profile.

Your record is emphatic on governance and press power but silent on huge swathes of British life — housing, defence, education, immigration beyond one vote, the constitution itself. For someone this clear on media control, the absence of a view on, say, electoral reform or foreign policy is a real gap.

Eleven scored votes is early days — enough to show a clear left lean and a real conviction on governance, not yet enough to call you fully. Cast a few more, especially somewhere like housing or defence, and next week's read will start cutting closer to the bone.