JordanBarr

Only one of your fourteen votes carries a clear political signature, but it's a telling one: you want power moved out of Westminster and into city regions, backing Andy Burnham's growth agenda without hesitation. The shape forming is of someone who wants a Britain run from Manchester and Glasgow as much as London — devolved, pragmatic, suspicious of the centre.

You split almost exactly down the middle with the national mood — agreeing on 8 of 14 — but the disagreements are pointed: you backed rejoining the EU when most of the country didn't, rejected the defence investment plan the nation waved through, and decided Shabana Mahmood had lost her mind when the country was far less sure.

Your one logged local comparison shows you in lockstep with your area on the Burnham powers question — full agreement, no daylight. Early days, but Coatbridge and Bellshill doesn't seem to be pulling you anywhere you weren't already going.

You've voted on museums and steel quotas but never on immigration, welfare, defence policy proper, housing or education — the bread-and-butter dividing lines of British politics. Right now we know more about your views on quangos than on the issues that actually decide elections.

This is a sketch, not a portrait — one scored vote is barely a brushstroke. Cast a few more on welfare, immigration or tax, and the picture sharpens fast; we'll be back next week to show you exactly how.