NickLangford

You want a Britain that doesn't get carried away — no forced pension-fund investing, no televised climate theatre, no restored 0.7% aid target. Four scored votes, and each one pulls the state back from doing more; this is a modest-state, spend-carefully instinct rather than a crusade.

On the two loudest votes here you stood apart from the whole country: Britain split evenly or leaned yes on the climate briefing and aid target, and you were flatly against both. Elsewhere — defence scrutiny, police leadership reform, transport contract flexibility — you moved with the crowd, which tells you this isn't contrarianism for its own sake, just a sharper line on where public money and public spectacle should stop.

Dundee Central mirrors you almost exactly — no to the pension mandate, no to the farming roadmap, no to the AI tutoring pilot, yes to police reform and the World Cup bank holiday. On a single-voter sample that's thin evidence, but so far you and your patch are reading from the same page.

Ten votes and not one has touched welfare, housing, immigration, health, or justice — the categories that usually do the most work in sorting a voter's politics. Right now you're defined more by fiscal caution and event-fatigue than by any settled view on the state's core obligations.

This is early days — four scored votes barely sketches a worldview. Cast a few more, especially on welfare or immigration, and next week's profile will start telling you something you didn't already suspect about yourself.