RoryAdams

You want a Britain that taxes wealth like it means it — property tax over stamp duty, billionaires reined in, CEOs shamed for their multiples — but you want that Britain defended, disciplined and selective about who gets in. You're not a pacifist redistributor; you're the sort who'll fund solar subsidies and slash the triple lock in the same sitting, because to you fairness means the state working, not the state being generous by default.

Last week you were "The Structuralist Left," a hard-left reformer with one defence wobble. That wobble has become a whole flank: welfare, immigration and defence now vote unanimously right, while economy and energy have hardened unanimously left. You haven't drifted to the centre so much as split down the middle with conviction on both halves — less "hard left with an exception," more a genuine two-sided operator.

You side with the national majority most of the time — 23 of 30 — but your dissents are pointed: you backed the unpopular 2030 clean-power push and solar subsidies when most of Britain balked, and you called Reform UK a danger when most didn't. You're a majority voter with a stubborn redistributive streak.

No local data yet to measure you against your patch — worth watching once it lands. And despite 41 scored votes, you've never touched health, transport, culture or science: a Britain-shaping profile with a curiously unexamined NHS and no view on the built environment at all.

Every vote you cast sharpens this — next week could confirm whether the hawkish welfare-and-immigration streak keeps hardening, or whether health and transport pull you back toward the structuralist left you started as. Come back and find out; the picture only gets truer.

You want a Britain that writes its own rules down — a proper constitution, power pulled out of London, consultancy contracts binned to save public money — and then spends what's saved on teachers and the cost of living rather than the Treasury's comfort. It's a left worldview less about slogans than about plumbing: fix the machinery, then be generous with it.

You're not a reflexive contrarian — you side with the national majority more often than not, backing the written constitution and the anti-London consensus right along with everyone else. But when Britain went cool on Burnham's radicalism (barely three in ten agreed), you were one of the few still in.

No local data has come through yet on your votes — early days here. As soon as your area starts voting alongside you, this is where the picture gets interesting.

Five scored votes is a strong start, not a verdict — and there's a striking gap: nothing yet on immigration, welfare, housing, health, or justice, the very terrain where "hard left" usually gets tested hardest. Right now you're a left economic reformer with a genuine right-leaning flicker on defence (that Hybrid Navy vote wasn't nothing) — but we don't yet know what you think about the issues that actually divide the electorate.

This is only the opening sketch. Cast a few votes on immigration or welfare and the throughline either hardens or cracks open — either way, next week's profile will be truer than this one.