REFNATION
GovernanceEnded 4 Jul

Should the UK move more power to the regions, using the success of areas like Manchester as a model?

Yes 57%No 43%35 votes cast

Manchester has operated under a directly elected mayor and combined authority since 2017, with powers over transport, housing, adult education and some health services. Devolution deals have since expanded to other areas including the West Midlands, South Yorkshire and West Yorkshire. Proponents of further regionalisation argue that local decision-making has delivered faster progress on projects such as Metrolink expansion and brownfield housing development.

Jump to opinions

Devolution scraped a win, 57% to 43%, on 35 votes — a clear but hardly emphatic verdict, the kind of margin that reflects a chamber persuaded rather than converted. This was not a rout in either direction; it was Yes doing just enough.

The real story is generational. Voters aged 25-34, by far the largest bloc here with 17 votes, backed more power for the regions by nearly two to one (65%). Strip them out and the rest of the sample tilts the other way — the 55-64s split 2-3 against, and the small clutch of over-65s leaned no too, with only one Yes among three. It is the young-adult vote that carried Manchester's model over the line.

That pattern tracks a familiar fault line in English governance debates: enthusiasm for devolved, city-region power tends to cluster among younger, urban-leaning voters who came of age watching Manchester's mayoralty and Metrolink expansion, while older voters remain more instinctively Westminster-centric. Men here were also somewhat keener than women (62% versus an even split), though with only six female voters that gap wants treating carefully.

A win for the "Manchester model", then, but one built on a single demographic pillar rather than a broad coalition.

LeftCentreRight
57%
Yes · 20 votes
43%
No · 15 votes
Spread the wordShare
Debate

0 Opinions

Sign in and vote to share your opinion.

Weigh in on the debate.