Is the Green Party a danger to British Society?

By 36 votes to 20, this chamber decided the Greens amount to a danger to British society, a comfortable if not overwhelming margin of 28 points on the sort of question that usually splits down partisan lines rather than producing a rout.

The real fracture is gender, not age. Women who voted broke 73% yes, a near three-to-one verdict, while men split almost down the middle at 53-47, barely distinguishable from a coin toss. That gap, wider than anything the age brackets produced, suggests the "danger" framing landed very differently depending on who was reading it.

Age, by contrast, told a messier story. The 55-64 bracket was the most hawkish on the Greens at 88% yes, while both the 45-54 and 65+ groups split evenly, and the younger cohorts, 16-24 and 25-34, still leaned yes at around six in ten. There is no clean generational story here, no straightforward echo of the net-zero-sceptic older voter versus climate-anxious youth divide that usually structures Green debates.

What's left is a chamber broadly convinced, but convinced unevenly, that a one-seat party of decarbonisation and wealth taxes constitutes a societal threat.