SimonFletcher

You vote for a Britain that punishes properly — whole-life terms, less judicial discretion, PIP tightened against soft awards — while starving the state of new taxes on wealth or houses it didn't earn. This is a fiscally hard, morally strict vision: earn your keep, serve your sentence, don't expect the triple lock to be sacred.

You split almost evenly with the country — agreeing on nuclear power, the Falklands, and locking down disabled parking, but breaking hard where it matters: backing whole-life sentences and PIP tightening when the nation was softer, and voting YES on trying Starmer for treason over immigration policy when most of Britain, even in disagreement with him, wouldn't go that far. That's not caution — that's conviction pushed past where most voters stop.

For someone this decided on justice, governance and economy, you've gone quiet on environment, agriculture, technology and business — an entire modern policy landscape sitting untouched next to a record that's otherwise unanimous.

One more vote sharpens this whole picture — and there's a real contradiction sitting in your record (a junk-food ad ban voted for on left-leaning instinct) worth testing again. Every week we rebuild this from what you actually do, so the more you vote, the truer it gets.