TheWorldsFastestTaxi

You want a Britain that spends big on the health service and taxes serious wealth to pay for it, but polices its safety net hard — tightening PIP, stopping mild ADHD claims, no soft touches. It's less small-state than exacting-state: generous where the need is proven, unforgiving where it isn't.

You're an outlier more often than not — Britain went 65% for regional devolution, 83% for stripping ADHD claimants, 80% for the capital health plan, and you agreed on the welfare calls but broke hard against devolution, no assembly for you. On casino sponsorship and net zero you sided with caution rather than the crowd's ambivalence.

Hastings and Rye reads like your mirror image — on every vote logged locally, your area matched you vote for vote, from blocking the Decent Homes Standard extension to backing the wealth tax. Early days with only one other local voter counted, but the alignment is total so far.

Ten votes and not one on immigration, crime, defence or education — for someone this decided on welfare and housing, the silence on justice and border policy is conspicuous. That's where your profile has the most room to sharpen.

Eight scored votes is a strong opening hand, not a finished picture — cast a few more on immigration or justice and we'll see whether the enforcer in you extends beyond the welfare state. Every vote you make writes the next version of this profile; come back and watch it get truer.