Willis82

You want a Britain that deports fast, builds fast, and doesn't let lawyers or committees slow either down — deportation for convicted foreign nationals, curbing judicial reviews on infrastructure, scrapping the GLA all sit on your ballot as one instinct: strip out the friction. But you're no reflexive hawk — you said no to expanding nuclear defence and no to banning extremist parties, and you backed carers' pay deals and heat-pump subsidies. This is a Britain run efficiently, not ideologically.

You're mostly in step with the country — you sided with the majority on eight of your ten votes, including the landslide for deporting foreign offenders and the strong support for cutting judicial review delays. Your real breaks from the herd are pointed: Britain voted 65-35 for more nuclear defence capability, and you were in the minority saying no.

No local data has landed yet for your area, so there's no patch comparison to draw — the national picture is your only mirror for now.

Ten votes in and you've said nothing on economy, health, justice, education or crime — a striking gap for someone this decisive on housing and immigration. Cast a vote or two there and this profile stops being a sketch and becomes a full portrait.

This is early days — eight scored votes is enough to see the shape but not yet the edges. Vote on the categories you've skipped and next week's read will sharpen into something sharper still — a profile that gets truer every time you show up.