kamran

You want a Britain that treats growth as the cure-all: cut green levies off business bills, chase a captive insurance regime, scrap net zero, and judge Starmer harshly for failing to deliver it. This is a competitiveness-first worldview — deregulate, grow, and let the rest follow.

You mostly ride with the crowd — siding with the national majority on 15 of your 20 votes, especially on business costs and space strategy, where you and the country moved almost in lockstep. But you split from the pack on the state-owned housebuilder, going right where the nation was evenly torn, and you broke left on Lords reform, backing a retirement age and attendance rules most of the right doesn't bother with.

Enfield North backed you almost everywhere — unanimous on immigration, ECHR withdrawal, net zero, business energy — a rare case of total local alignment. The one clean break: you and your area both rejected the NHS Quality Strategy and the state housebuilder, quietly agreeing that the state should do less, not more.

Six scored votes is early days — you've never weighed in on welfare, education, justice, or immigration policy detail, despite immigration being one of your strongest instincts elsewhere. That's a lot of Britain still unmapped for someone whose economic convictions already read this clearly.

This is a first sketch, not a verdict — vote on welfare or justice next and the picture sharpens fast. Every vote you cast from here rewrites this profile; come back and watch it get truer.