Members back nuclear expansion and cyclist ID but reject tying NHS cash to efficiency

The day's most striking result came on Should extra NHS funding depend on it first meeting efficiency targets? where members chose against the idea, narrowly defeating the proposition that more money should be withheld until targets are hit. "Need the extra funding to improve efficiency" became the circle No voters kept returning to.

The verdicts

On Should the UK expand its nuclear power capacity as part of its future energy mix? members voted overwhelmingly yes, with the pragmatic centre captured by one remark: "I do not like nuclear anything. But needs must." Support came shadowed by doubts about cost and delivery.

Should cyclists need third-party insurance and a visible ID number so they can be identified? saw yes win comfortably. The case for accountability carried the day even as its strongest advocates acknowledged the practical difficulty of enforcing it.

Members backed Should salaries from all publicly paid jobs for one person never exceed the PM's salary, £174,039 in 2026/27? by a narrow margin, choosing to cap one person's publicly paid job salaries at the prime minister's level. The strongest argument against pointed away from public appointments altogether.

Should employers pay only half the usual National Insurance on staff aged 21 to 24? passed narrowly. Yet the most-respected case against it warned that a break aimed at this age group could miss younger people shut out of work and simply reward employers for cycling through staff.

On Is the government doing enough to tackle rising antisemitism in the UK? members delivered a comfortable no. The winning case blamed not merely a failure to protect Jewish communities but a government it saw as helping create the danger.

Should affluent communities share responsibility for housing asylum seekers? produced a comfortable yes. "You have to put them somewhere" proved the strongest argument, though the real debate was less about where asylum seekers should live than whether they should be housed in UK communities at all.

Members voted comfortably against If the triple lock is reformed, should the savings go to young people rather than pensioners?, with the strongest yes case instead wanting savings used to cut taxes rather than transferred to the young.

Finally, Should the Defence budget rise to 4% of GDP by end of this parliament? saw an overwhelming yes, though on notably low turnout.

Voting continues today on refnation.

Have your say

Every verdict above was decided by people like you. See the full results →

Today's referendums are already live. Cast your vote — or create an account and be counted.