Members back scrapping stamp duty and energy standing charges

The day's most striking result came on Should stamp duty on buying a home be abolished? Members chose for abolishing stamp duty on buying a home. The most-respected No case warned that cheaper purchases could send prices ballooning; Yes nevertheless won comfortably, with the argument for freeing people to move meeting a clear warning about what might follow.

The verdicts

On Should donating suitable organs to the NHS after death be compulsory? members chose against making donating your organs for use by the NHS compulsory. The state’s claim over a dead person’s body was the argument that gave No its sharpest edge: voters rejected compulsion overwhelmingly, even as Yes voters argued that presumed donation should be the default.

Should energy standing charges be scrapped, so bills are based only on usage? saw members choose for banning energy standing charges. Energy bills should follow consumption, Yes voters said, but even the strongest case for scrapping standing charges wanted the replacement costs ring-fenced and audited. The proposal won overwhelmingly; the argument was less about whether the charges feel unfair than who should pay for the network.

Members chose for requiring vapes to be licensed like alcohol sales in Should the sale of vapes require a licence in the same way as the sale of alcohol? The licensing case was strongest when it joined health worries to the question of who should be allowed to sell vapes; the sharpest objection was that paperwork might create a black market rather than curb one.

Should all UK prisons be run by the state rather than private companies? delivered a clear win for removing private investment and profiteering from the prison service and returning prisons to fully state. Prisoners’ liberty, not the market’s efficiency, supplied the winning Yes case: the proposal to put every prison under state control won overwhelmingly. Yet the strongest No arguments were not dismissive of accountability; they challenged whether ownership was the right test.

In Should Personal Independence Payment (PIP) stop covering mental health conditions? members chose against stopping PIP covering mental health conditions. “Mental health conditions are a disability” was the No case in a sentence: voters rejected ending PIP cover comfortably, while arguing over how tightly it should be drawn.

Has the Green Party moved away from its focus on the environment? produced an overwhelming Yes. Yes voters made the Green Party’s wider activism the evidence that its environmental purpose had faded; the most-respected Yes case called the environment “an afterthought at best”. No voters answered that climate policy reaches into daily life and that a party seeking government cannot remain single-issue, yet the vote delivered a clear verdict while leaving the argument over what counts as environmental politics unresolved.

Finally, Should councils use parking fees to protect services like parks and leisure centres from cuts? saw members choose for using parking fees to protect services like parks and leisure centres from cuts. “Vital to the health of our communities” met “our road network needs the ring-fenced money more”: Yes won comfortably, but the argument was over which public good parking charges should protect.

Voting continues today on refnation.

Have your say

Every verdict above was decided by people like you. See the full results →

Today's referendums are already live. Cast your vote — or create an account and be counted.