Burnham's Northern Number 10 rebuffed as UK splits on welfare reset

The most striking tension of the day was not a landslide but a pair of narrow rebuffs that exposed deep generational fault lines. Should Burnham run part of his government from a "Northern Number 10" in Manchester? received a clear no from the UK, with the chamber rejecting the idea by eight points on a question that turned less on geography than on whether real devolution can ever be handed down from Whitehall. Almost in lockstep, Should Burnham hand England's regions sweeping new powers in a "devolution big bang"? was also turned down, this time by ten points, with the youngest voters backing the rush almost unanimously while everyone over thirty-five recoiled.

The verdicts

On welfare the country split almost down the middle. Is it time to suspend all benefits and have all claimants reevaluated? fell narrowly short, with no prevailing by ten points, yet the real finding was the inversion: voters in their thirties and early forties backed the drastic reset most emphatically while the youngest and those in their late forties and fifties pulled hardest the other way. By contrast the chamber that will actually need care backed Should England create a National Care Service that operates on NHS principles? by two to one, with those over sixty-five supporting it by nine to one, though the awkward question of funding remained conspicuously unresolved.

The licence fee, long a sore point, has apparently outlived its argument. Should the BBC Licence be scrapped and replaced by a subscription service? passed by a clear three-to-two margin, even as the strongest opponents warned that convenience would come at the price of a smaller, meaner corporation. On immigration the UK drew a hard line: Should any non-citizen immigrant ever be eligible to receive state benefits such as housing, money, education or NHS? was rejected by roughly three in five, with only two in five prepared to extend any entitlement.

Defence and housing saw clearer majorities. Should the Ministry of Defence reimburse early years childcare costs for service families in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland? passed comfortably, though the split ran along gender rather than age, with men in favour and women divided the other way. Should the UK government promote structural timber to accelerate housebuilding? secured a modest yes, with the middle-aged proving the soft spot in an otherwise solid coalition.

Energy questions produced the day's most dramatic split and its widest mandate. Should fracking be allowed? was decided by a single vote out of 111 cast, the chamber cracked clean along generational and gender lines. By contrast Should the UK approve the Rosebank and Jackdaw North Sea drilling projects? sailed through by a wide margin, folded into the cost-of-living argument, though the youngest voters staged the one visible revolt against it. On animal research the recoil was decisive: Should the UK allow generative AI to support licensing and ethical oversight in animal research? was rejected by three in four. Finally, Should the UK pursue full nationalisation of utilities funded solely by consolidating private pension funds? fell by a slim margin; the philosophy found sympathy but the specific mechanism of raiding pension pots did not.

Voting continues today on fresh questions facing the country.

Have your say

Every verdict above was decided by people like you. See the full results →

Today's questions are already live. Cast your vote — or create an account and be counted.