UK votes to replace Refugee Convention and draws hard line on women's spaces

The UK has told the Labour government it carries some responsibility for the rise in youth unemployment, even though the problem predates Keir Starmer’s arrival in Downing Street. In the same breath the country voted to replace the Refugee Convention, declared that white British people becoming a minority would matter, and demanded a clearer wall between news reporting and opinion.

The verdicts

Should the Refugee Convention be replaced with a new agreement? sailed through with the winning argument that the 1951 treaty was never built for a planet of eight billion people; critics insisted the fault lay in how it is applied, not the text itself.

Would it be a problem if white British people became a minority in the UK? produced the day’s clearest verdict, with the country saying yes by more than two to one. The debate quickly moved from raw demography to questions of consent, cohesion and cultural continuity.

Do transgender people pose a threat to women's rights and single-sex spaces? delivered an emphatic yes. “Women said NO. That’s all you need to know” caught the defensive, boundary-drawing mood; compromise was in short supply.

Should UK news outlets be barred from mixing opinion with news reporting? passed comfortably. Most voters wanted a sturdy wall between straight reporting and editorialising, though many preferred a door rather than an outright ban on analysis.

With giving Ukraine blueprints for long range missiles, are we slowly creeping towards war with Russia? also carried the day. The room backed the warning of a slow drift into conflict, despite strong counter-arguments that robust support for Ukraine is the best way to deter Moscow.

Is the current Labour government responsible for the increase in youth unemployment? split the UK almost down the middle but ended with a narrow yes. The conversation kept circling back to austerity, weak investment and the disappearance of entry-level jobs.

Do Reform UK and the Greens win support mainly from voters with little political knowledge? was firmly rejected. The floor called the framing lazy and patronising; dismissing insurgent-party voters as ignorant was judged the real offence.

Should convicted offenders have to repay the cost of their punishment? narrowly failed. The country disliked the idea of turning a prison term into a second invoice that risks pushing people deeper into debt.

Voting continues today on fresh questions.

Have your say

Every verdict above was decided by people like you. See the full results →

Today's questions are already live. Cast your vote — or create an account and be counted.