UK says it's had enough of being easily offended

The UK has declared itself fed up with tiptoeing around offence. In the day's most emphatic result, voters said the country has become too easily offended, with the cleanest line of the debate — "no-one has the right not to be offended" — carrying the room. The losing side's sharper warnings about the damage speech can do were heard but firmly outvoted.

The verdicts

On rights and equality the country also backed removing legal protections for Islamic practice and belief, embracing the refrain of "one law for all". Some framed the vote as a demand for genuine equal protection rather than special treatment, and it carried decisively.

The UK split almost down the middle on whether young people who are NEET are not lazy but just need proper opportunities, with Andy Burnham's view prevailing by nearly three votes to two. The winning side stressed routes into work rather than excuses, while the room agreed that labelling every NEET lazy was itself a lazy argument.

Voters showed little patience for the status quo elsewhere. They said the UK should introduce citizen-initiated referendums on major issues such as net zero, though the narrower result came with warnings that it could lock the country into permanent campaigning. A clear majority also declared the UK should stop paying France to stop small boat crossings, dismissing the policy as pointless and demanding consequences instead of blank cheques.

AI is a threat to jobs according to the country, which voted yes by nearly four to one. The sharpest diagnosis focused on the bottom of the ladder, even as respected voices insisted disruption would create new work.

In housing the UK proved sceptical of good intentions. The Renters' Rights Act will end up hurting the tenants it was meant to help, voters judged by two to one, with warnings that reduced supply and rising rents would hit the bottom of the pile hardest. The room also backed capping ground rents on existing leasehold properties at a peppercorn, describing the current system as archaic and quasi-feudal.

Voting continues today.

Have your say

Every verdict above was decided by people like you. See the full results →

Today's questions are already live. Cast your vote — or create an account and be counted.