REFNATION
EnvironmentNationalClosed · Final

Should the UK abandon its net zero target by 2050?

Yes 72%No 28%65 votes cast

The Humber region is Britain's largest industrial cluster by economic activity and emissions, home to steel, chemicals, refining and manufacturing. The Humber Energy Board estimates £22-44bn of private investment and over 20,000 jobs could be created over 20 years via green industries including offshore wind, hydrogen, solar and carbon capture. Reform UK leaders oppose net zero, calling it 'stupid' and pledging to cut clean energy subsidies and contracts.

Jump to opinions· 4

There is no generational fault line here to lean on: from the handful of 16-24s to the 55-64s, who turned out in the greatest numbers, majorities of two to one or better wanted net zero gone. Britain's climate consensus, at least among those who bothered to vote, looks less like a live argument than a settled one running the other way.

Women who took part were even firmer than men, backing repeal by nine to one, while men still landed decisively for scrapping the target by better than two to one. That gender gap, small in absolute numbers but consistent in direction, is the one texture in an otherwise uniform result.

The question was pointedly asked of a region built on the target's promise — the Humber's steel, chemicals and refining, and the tens of thousands of green jobs its own energy board says net zero could bring. That the vote still broke so heavily for abandonment suggests the argument over subsidies, contracts and "stupid" green spending, as Reform frames it, is landing even on the industrial ground meant to benefit most.

A regional economy staked on the transition voted, decisively, against the target that underwrites it.

LeftCentreRight
  • P
    The Fortress ScepticRight
    YES
  • R
    The Devolutionist WreckerLeft
    YES
  • Astobie1· 257
    The Compassionate EnforcerRight
    YES
  • Rosscoe· 32
    The Firm-Border RealistRight
    YES
  • NickB· 109
    The Security DemocratCentre Right
    YES
  • The Cautious ProgressiveCentre Right
    YES
  • The Republican DisciplinarianRight
    YES
  • C
    crooner· 358
    The ConstituentRight
    YES
  • M
    Moondevil· 170
    The Fortress Housing EgalitarianRight
    YES
  • F
    Flipflops· 381
    The Defence-Minded ReformerCentrist
    YES
  • S
    Sorrel· 283
    The Sovereignty GatekeeperRight
    YES
  • E
    Enginesan· 432
    The Public-Power DissenterLeft
    NO
  • Artikel5· 217
    The Border-First InterventionistCentre Right
    YES
  • The Armoured Housing StatistRight
    YES
  • ThisisKaj· 379
    Leader of PeopleCentre Left
    YES
  • Aokay· 20
    Hard Left
    NO
  • L
    The Constitutional EnforcerHard Right
    YES
  • The Hardline Environmentalist HawkHard Right
    YES
  • The Cautious LocalistRight
    YES
  • lewism· 607
    The Supreme LeaderRight
    NO
72%
Yes · 47 votes
28%
No · 18 votes
Spread the wordShare
Debate

4 Opinions

Sign in and vote to share your opinion.
Astobie1· 257
The Compassionate Enforcer
Voted yesRight

Start with energy wealth and transition not switch.

The Sovereignty-First Enforcer
Voted yesRight

Net zero is a hoax

The Peacetime Leveller
Voted noHard Left

We need a Green New Deal approach - decarbon and massive investment in green technologies to create jobs and drive sustainable economic growth.