BradleyTempleton

You are clearly right on sovereignty, borders, welfare, taxation and defence: a country with firmer rules, stronger deterrence and less appetite for open-ended public spending. Yet you are no simple small-state conservative; your housing votes consistently put you behind rent controls, decent homes standards and strategic regional planning, while your NHS votes suggest you prefer reform and accountability to unquestioned expansion.

A while back, you were The Grid-and-Border Realist; now you are The Armoured Housing Statist. You have held the same hard constitutional and defence line, but the record has broadened into welfare discipline, economic restraint and public-service scepticism — while your leftward housing instinct has not only survived but sharpened.

You usually find the national mood, but not meekly: across the record you have backed the public on some practical reforms while breaking against it on care, benefits, devolution, proportional representation and public spending. The defining contradiction is clear — you are tougher than the UK on welfare, yet more willing than many on the right to let the state intervene in housing.

Your centre-right circle is genuinely yours: you agree on roughly two-thirds of shared votes, so you run with the crowd more often than against it. But you sit further right than its average, with your housing statism the unusual soft edge in an otherwise harder-edged outlook.

Your next ten votes will test whether the housing exception remains a principled commitment or whether welfare discipline starts to govern every public service. Keep voting: the picture is already distinctive, and each ballot makes the next read truer.

You want a Britain that's hard at the edges and organised in the middle: strong on deterrence, unsentimental on immigration and extremism, but oddly comfortable with government drawing up 20-30 year spatial strategies for where houses and jobs go. This isn't confusion — it's a worldview where the state builds infrastructure and enforces borders, and leaves culture-war niceties to the majority's common sense.

You're rarely an outlier — siding with the national majority on seven of your ten votes, whether that's scrapping net zero (most of Britain agrees) or building nuclear capability (73% back you). Your one real break from the crowd is banning extremist parties: the nation split against it and so did you, but from the opposite direction of most who voted no — you're wary of state overreach here, even as you cheer it on housing strategy.

Bournemouth West mirrors you almost exactly — unanimous yes on nuclear defence, net zero repeal, deportations and spatial strategies — except on rejoining the EU and banning extremist parties, where your area voted no in lockstep with you against a more divided nation. It's a comfortable fit, though with only one local vote per question, it's more echo than evidence yet.

You've never voted on welfare, health, the economy or education — the bread-and-butter categories that usually decide how "right" someone really is. Right now you're a foreign-and-planning right-winger; a few votes on tax or the NHS budget would tell us if that holds.

Ten votes is a start, not a verdict — cast a few more, especially somewhere unexpected like welfare or education, and this profile will sharpen from a plausible sketch into a genuinely earned portrait. Every vote you make writes the next version of you.