Reafepac

You want a country generous to migrants, soft on sentencing, rejoining the EU — but run through structures you'd happily dynamite: no automatic elections, no unchanged Barnett formula, a federation you actually voted down. This isn't confusion; it's a voter who trusts left values more than left institutions.

You split almost exactly down the middle with the country — sided with the majority on 18 of 30 votes — but the agreements are deceptive. You align with the nation on chaos-and-drama questions (Starmer's resignation, Britain's "joke country" status) while breaking hard on the substance: national mood said no to rejoining the EU, tougher sentencing, and Barnett protections — you went the other way each time.

Leith votes with near-unanimous certainty, and you're rarely its outlier — solar subsidies, EU return, Shabana Mahmood's removal, steel quotas, all matched 100% locally. The one break: you voted against a general election trigger while your own area said yes — a rare moment you sided with Westminster stability over your neighbours' appetite for another vote.

For someone this opinionated, the silence is loud: no vote on Housing, Welfare, Health, Defence or Education — the bread-and-butter of governing, untouched while you've weighed in on Xbox Game Pass and Norman City's data centre moratorium. That's a hole in an otherwise sharp profile.

This is early-days territory on the categories that matter most — sixteen scored votes is a sketch, not a portrait. Cast a few more on welfare or housing and the contradiction at your core — egalitarian instincts, institutional distrust — will either resolve or deepen. Either way, we'll be watching, and next week's read will be truer than this one.