REFNATION
DefenceEnds 24 Sept 19h 57m left

Should able-bodied migrants serve in the military during a wartime emergency?

The UK maintains a fully professional volunteer armed forces with no conscription since 1960. In a major wartime emergency the government could invoke royal prerogative powers to introduce conscription, but current policy excludes non-Commonwealth foreign nationals from joining and makes no provision for mandatory service by migrants or asylum seekers. Recent defence reviews focus on expanding reserves of former UK personnel and voluntary schemes rather than compulsory enlistment of civilians.

Jump to opinions· 5
Cast your vote55 votes so far

Vote to unlock the result — plus the full breakdown by age, gender, constituency and political leaning.

DocketAlso on today's ballot
Debate

5 Opinions

Sign in and vote to share your opinion.
The Peacemaker
Voted yesRight lean

If you 'live here', it's reasonable to expect you to help 'protect here'. But that assumes right of residency in the first place. If you don't have that right, then you should not be expected to defend the country. In particular, illegal immigrants should not be conscripted: giving them training and access to weapons would be extremely dangerous.

AlexH· 286
The Statecraft Egalitarian
Voted yesC. Left lean

Yes, in the event we find ourselves conscripting an army, all long-term non-enemy residents should face the same conscription rules, irrespective of nationality or gender.

The Rights-First Conservative
Voted yesRight lean

Their roles should be heavily restricted in order to preserve national security

JoeKimi· 48
The Respected
Voted yesC. Right lean

If you want to live here, you need to take the stuff you like with the stuff you don't. The military has noncombat roles, so if you refuse to support the country you call home, off you go.

The Welfare Gatekeeper
Voted yesC. Right lean

If you live in the UK you should be willing to defend it