Should the Department for Culture, Media and Sport be abolished?
GovernanceEnds 15 Oct 10h 59m left

Should the Department for Culture, Media and Sport be abolished?

The department that covers culture, arts, media, sport and tourism in England is now styled the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, after DCMS was replaced in 2026. Its 2026/27 spending plans include about £1.58bn of day-to-day budget and £752m of capital, with sports, museums and arts funding the largest areas. A 2025 press report that it would be split between other departments was denied by a minister, and in October 2026 the Conservatives pledged a £1bn cut to its budget.

Jump to opinions· 18
Cast your vote1,164 votes so far

Vote to unlock the result — plus the full breakdown by age, gender, constituency and political leaning.

DocketAlso on today's ballot
Debate

18 Opinions

Sign in and vote to share your opinion.
JohnnyBoy· 527
The Housing Sovereigntist
Voted yesRight lean

Idea of State support for the Arts has always seemed very totalitarian & of course it shovels vast amounts of tax payers cash into fashionable activist led ventures, much of which is politically motivated by the left. It would be better to provide tax relief for individuals & companies to support the Arts. It’s then focused on talent & demand not directed by bureaucratic fief. If you have a Government Department it manufactures interference & always seeks > funding. Abolish

The Fiscal Custodian
Voted noRight lean

It's riddled with ideological woodworm and most of what it does could be done in an afternoon, but, no, giving its brief away is not the answer. Then we would never see what it was up to and we would have even less accountability over it.

Seneca· 390★
The Lean-State Pragmatist
Voted yesRight lean

The government shouldn’t be involved in these matters at all. It’s one of several unecessary areas of government spending that should be abolished

The Unifier
Voted noCentre lean

No it should not. It supports British heritage, tourism, sport and creative industries, which create jobs and boost the economy. abolishing it would simply shift its responsibilities elsewhere, potentially creating more bureaucracy rather than saving money, Reforming inefficiencies would be a better solution overalll

AndyDevon· 246
The Frugal Libertarian
Voted noRight lean

What would scrapping it achieve? One less Cabinet Secretary's salary per year. The civil servants and the department's budget will all be consumed by other Whitehall departments.

The Market-Border Restrictionist
Voted yesRight lean

Yes let’s call it what it is instead - the Department of Digital Censorship, Meddling & Sexual Abuse of the Indigenous People

Slawomir· 933
The Accountable Capitalist
Voted yesRight lean

The Department of National Heritage, predecessor of Department for Culture, Media and Sport, has been formed in April 1992. I am assuming prior to it culture, media and sport didn't exist in the UK. Another place for bureaucrats proving their necessity. Abolish.

RAS· 216
The Rule-of-Law Nationalist
Voted noRight lean

No. It needs a complete refocus, not abolition. British taxpayers should fund the preservation and promotion of BRITISH culture, heritage, arts, history and sporting excellence. I'm not interested in financing endless multicultural vanity projects or ideological activism. Other cultures are theirs to celebrate; I'll happily explore them on holiday or watch National Geographic. Our institutions should champion our own civilisation, not apologise for it. Audit every penny.

Spocky· 125
The Orderly Traditionalist
Voted noC. Right lean

No but it should focus more on supporting traditional British cultures, especially English which have been woefully neglected even with the Union in favour of devolved nations (Scottish, Welsh and to lesser extent NI) as well as stopping promotion of multi-culturalism which has been a disaster. We need to promote a common unifying British culture that can bring society together rather than encouraging immigrants to perpetuate their native cultures in their new home.

The Fiscal Plain-Speaker
Voted yesRight lean

Totally, it’s a complete waste of govt time & money. We can still set aside money to support various of these issues but it certainly doesn’t need the numbers of staff this department has