REFNATION
Should politicians face criminal charges for deliberately lying to the public on matters of significant public concern?
GovernanceEnds 1 Oct 21h 28m left

Should politicians face criminal charges for deliberately lying to the public on matters of significant public concern?

The Public Office (Accountability) Bill, known as the Hillsborough Law, received approval in the House of Commons in July 2026 and is under scrutiny in the Lords. It introduces a duty of candour and criminalises serious deception by public officials and senior ministers. Amendments by Labour MP Luke Myer sought to extend this to deliberately misleading the public on significant matters, though government positions have varied on scope and free speech concerns.

Jump to opinions· 6
Cast your vote54 votes so far

Vote to unlock the result — plus the full breakdown by age, gender, constituency and political leaning.

DocketAlso on today's ballot
Debate

6 Opinions

Sign in and vote to share your opinion.
AW84· 214
The Unifier
Voted yesC. Left lean

Yes - would it 'chill political speech & prove difficult to define & enforce fairly'? Probably. However - we would be fact checking again in real time for a majority of issues, data, facts... The onus to prove the lies will be back in the liars hands. They have been playing the public for too long & it's no longer just politicking. Show me the TRUTH, the good & bad. I will make up my own mind based on my core instincts of justice, freedom, prosperity & shared humanity.

BenL· 362
The Lawgiver
Voted noC. Left lean

I mean, by "lying about matter of significant public concern", what exactly do we mean here? Arresting every politician responsible for breaking manifesto promises after the election? We'd be left with an empty House of Commons and the remaining MPs speaking in meaningless bureaucratic riddles.

The Small-State Fiscalist
Voted noH. Right lean

I've voted no but in an ideal world it would be yes. In our world, the "machine" would use this law to go after the opposition and dissenting voices - who gets to decide what was misleading or what is "true"? We've all seen how easily a minister, prime or otherwise, can squirm their way out of a situation and in recent months we've seen disgraced MPs welcomed back, all forgiven.

Voted yesLeft lean

As a particular group of some 600 MPs and however many lords, councillors and royals, they should be held to the highest accountability given the trust we've endowed in them for the upkeep of our institutions. I would go so far as to extend it to judges as well.

Slawomir· 821
The Accountable Capitalist
Voted noRight lean

No, they should not be elected ever again. But liarvote liars.

The Polymath
Voted yesRight lean

If we are being held accountable for X posts, they should be equally accountable on the record. QED.