refnation

The refnation Android app is available now. The daily ballot as a notification at 8am.

GET THE APP
Should stamp duty on buying a home be abolished?
HousingEnds 8 Oct 8h 56m left

Should stamp duty on buying a home be abolished?

Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) is currently charged on residential property purchases in England and Northern Ireland above £125,000 at rates of 2% to 12% in bands, with first-time buyers paying nothing up to £300,000 on homes up to £500,000 and an extra 5% surcharge on additional properties. The thresholds reverted to these levels on 1 April 2025 after temporary higher thresholds expired. Abolishing it would remove a tax that raises billions annually but is often criticised for reducing housing market mobility.

Jump to opinions· 45
Cast your vote1,316 votes so far

Vote to unlock the result — plus the full breakdown by age, gender, constituency and political leaning.

DocketAlso on today's ballot
Debate

45 Opinions

Sign in and vote to share your opinion.
Chelle· 249
The Security-State Housekeeper
Voted noRight lean

Reform it, don't remove it. Reduce the amount and raise the threshold for homes that have to pay.

The Practical Leftist
Voted yesLeft lean

Yes, it should be abolished without question, for a pragmatic reason: it isn't "help to buy" (prices will probably go up to match; we've seen that in the stamp duty holiday), but friction. Housing is a problem in the UK, and stamp duty adds friction to the housing market. For example, a couple whose children have flown the nest might be discouraged from downsizing because stamp duty would eat a large part of the equity they'd otherwise release by the move.

The Bounded-Authority Right
Voted noRight lean

Where is the money going to come from to replace it?

Glasses· 707
The Atlantic Gatekeeper
Voted yesRight lean

A little more help to those saving to buy.

SimonD· 99
The Statesman
Voted yesC. Right lean

It prevents labour market mobility, locks elderly people in empty nest homes and generally acts as an artificial break on economic growth.

The Assimilationist
Voted yesRight lean

Make it lifetime bound rather than single purchase bound. ie if you own a 700k property and move to a 950k one, you only pay on the 250k addition, whereas if you downsize to at a 500k property you wouldn't pay anything. At the moment it just gums up the market - I want to move but the sunk cost from paying it just 4 years ago prevents me from wanting to pay again.

vicki· 61
The Grounded Middle
Voted noCentre lean

Reformed rather than abolished last time they paused stamp duty the market massively overheated with prices significantly rising many people are now struggling because their mortgage rates have hugely increased because they have had to borrow larger sums, it probably didn't help inflation I understand it was COVID times but the policy needs to be really thought out on the wider effects on economy. The government would have to raise other taxes to pay for it.

AndyDevon· 190
The Resource Nationalist
Voted yesRight lean

Not necessarily abolish, but amend so it is paid by seller not purchaser. Will need to ensure current owners are not taxed twice on the same property though.

The Statesman
Voted yesLeft lean

There is an argument for keeping an extra tax on purchasing additional properties but it would be abolished for primary residences

The Welfare-State Pragmatist
Voted noCentre lean

I dont think it should be abolished but certainly reformed. The bands need to be moved back to a realistic level. 0% for 1st time buyers and then graduated the same way income tax is