refnation

The refnation Android app is available now. The daily ballot as a notification at 8am.

GET THE APP
Should energy standing charges be scrapped, so bills are based only on usage?
EnergyEnds 8 Oct 10h 37m left

Should energy standing charges be scrapped, so bills are based only on usage?

UK households on default tariffs pay daily standing charges even with zero usage: from 1 October to 31 December 2026 these average 54.83p per day for electricity and 29.68p per day for gas, or about £308 a year for dual-fuel direct debit customers. These fixed charges cover network, operating and policy costs and form part of Ofgem's quarterly energy price cap, which also sets maximum unit rates. A pilot for lower-standing-charge tariffs began in 2026, but full abolition would require shifting all fixed costs onto unit rates.

Jump to opinions· 34
Cast your vote1,255 votes so far

Vote to unlock the result — plus the full breakdown by age, gender, constituency and political leaning.

DocketAlso on today's ballot
Debate

34 Opinions

Sign in and vote to share your opinion.
Fletch· 474
The Unionist Custodian
Voted yesRight lean

We no longer have utilities that are 100% British therefore no standing charge is applicable

Glasses· 707
The Atlantic Gatekeeper
Voted yesRight lean

What a fantastic idea. !!

SimonD· 99
The Statesman
Voted noC. Right lean

A standing charge helps cover the cost of the infrastructure that we all share, a usage charge covers the cost of energy. The current system makes economic sense.

The Statesman
Voted yesLeft lean

Nationalisation would be a much better way to maintain and upgrade the underlying infrastructure

The Anti-Interventionist
Voted yesC. Left lean

This standing charge has forever been a bane on every users finances, it's time it was abolished

AndyDevon· 190
The Resource Nationalist
Voted yesRight lean

You can control costs through usage, but get massively clobbered by the standing charges, which are in essence taxes by another name.

Octig· 133
The Centre-Right Justice Hardliner
Voted noC. Right lean

Standing charges are representative of operating costs, so the cost will just be met by putting the KW/HR rate up, raising costs for high users

The Energy-Security Right
Voted yesRight lean

Yes because it would make bills simpler to understand, predict and therefore manage.

JohnnyBoy· 471
The Planning Liberator
Voted yesRight lean

Energy companies used to bill quarterly now they bill monthly & pester all with their inflated readings & demands. They skew the market for their cash flow & the public pays for their inefficiencies. I had a dispute & discovered British Gas were trying to bill me £9K for an empty unit where they had read a water meter by mistake. Took 10 months to resolve. £50 compensation. Zero incentive for them. Abolish standing charges disconnect smart meters & bill quarterly.

The Early-Days Balancer
Voted yesCentre lean

This is kind of a "yes... but". Under normal circumstances, the costs of the infrastructure should come out of the profits of the supply. That said, there may be cases where a building needs an energy supply, but uses very little of it and therefore the infrastructure costs are disproportionate to the revenue. In those cases, a small standing charge may be appropriate.