refnation

The refnation Android app is available now. The daily ballot as a notification at 8am.

GET THE APP
Should Personal Independence Payment (PIP) stop covering mental health conditions?
WelfareEnds 8 Oct 8h 58m left

Should Personal Independence Payment (PIP) stop covering mental health conditions?

PIP is not means-tested and is paid to people with long-term physical or mental health conditions based on how they affect daily living and mobility, not diagnosis alone. As of July 2026, 4.09 million people claim PIP, with psychiatric disorders the primary condition for 39% (around 1.6 million). Government reviews and opposition proposals are examining tighter rules for mental health claims amid rising costs, but it currently covers 46 mental health conditions if they meet the points thresholds.

Jump to opinions· 71
Cast your vote1,298 votes so far

Vote to unlock the result — plus the full breakdown by age, gender, constituency and political leaning.

DocketAlso on today's ballot
Debate

71 Opinions

Sign in and vote to share your opinion.
Chelle· 249
The Security-State Housekeeper
Voted noRight lean

The system is being abused currently, but this will not fix it.

The Practical Leftist
Voted noLeft lean

Mental health conditions can be absolutely debilitating, so I see no principled reason for a blanket exclusion. Profound clinical depression gets in the way of productive work as much as a physical illness can. Whether the PIP criteria get mental health conditions right would be a very different question. But that's not the question being asked.

Dragontao· 439
The Foreign-Policy Reformer
Voted noC. Right lean

Not all mental health conditions are equal and varied. Some can be severely debilitating. There does need to be care taken so that it doesn't become another bloated system where any mental health issue will lead to a claim being accepted and open to abuse.

SimonD· 99
The Statesman
Voted noC. Right lean

The definition of mental health conditions seems too broad and too generous at the moment. So tighten the rules for sure. But at the same time there are many people with genuine mental health conditions who do need assistance.

Fletch· 474
The Unionist Custodian
Voted noRight lean

Mental health is invisible but depression is not bi-polar. The criteria for mental health does need changed though

The Cross-Current Voter
Voted yesCentre lean

Mental indication diagnoses are becoming intertwined with disability, which is simply not the same thing.

Glasses· 707
The Atlantic Gatekeeper
Voted yesRight lean

I think I've said before "where did it come from " seems to have just appeared!!! Let it dissappear again any money that would have gone to anyone can be spent on psychological help , any medical interventions etc

Bigden40· 522
The Unifier
Voted noRight lean

No. The whole benefits system needs serious reform, the number of people on disability benefits and PIPs is not credible and is untenable as a percentage of the population. But this is equally true of physical and mental disabilities. Serious mental health issues should be taken into account, but the bar needs to be set appropriately.

The Assimilationist
Voted yesRight lean

The country is broke. Keep piling on more and more claimants if you like but sooner or later the system will collapse and then there will be no PIP for anyone

JohnnyBoy· 471
The Housing Sovereigntist
Voted noRight lean

However the system should be seriously reformed. Everybody has to be pigeon holed with some kind of condition or other and it’s frankly shocking what ‘conditions’ attract financial support & how marginal complaints result in claimants not working. This is intentional and part of a much larger plan for UBI when Agenda 2030 is fully implemented.