Should higher education funding be shifted to prioritise vocational and apprenticeship routes?

The sharpest fracture is gender, not age. Men voted 75% yes (41 of 55), essentially replicating the national result at scale, while women split the other way, rejecting the shift 10 to 6 — a 38% yes share that runs directly counter to the overall verdict. On a question about steering money away from traditional university routes, that divide echoes long-standing debates about who benefits from academic versus technical pathways, and whose careers still lean on the former.

Age, by contrast, produced no rebellion at all — every bracket landed on the yes side, from a soft 58% among 25-34s to a near-unanimous 93% among 55-64s, the platform's most emphatic bloc. That the oldest working cohort, likely furthest from needing an apprenticeship themselves, backed the pivot most strongly suggests this reads less as generational self-interest than as a verdict on the system's current failures — skills shortages, collapsing apprenticeship starts, £400m a year on Level 7 courses — rather than a fight over whose children get funded.

The real dividing line here wasn't young against old, but a gender gulf sharp enough to make the national landslide look, on closer inspection, like two different referendums.