Should MPs give up taxpayer-funded second homes for shared accommodation near Parliament?
MPs who represent seats outside London can claim accommodation costs from the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA). These cover rent, hotels or running costs for one property, in London or the constituency, and MPs cannot claim mortgage payments. For 2026-27 the cap is £33,840 for renting in London and £22,780 outside London, with extra allowed for dependants. Since 2025 MPs cannot claim rent paid to another MP under new tenancies. Because IPSA, not Parliament, sets these rules, a communal housing scheme would need a separate decision by the Commons or IPSA.
4 Opinions
Forcing communal housing on MPs with children or caring duties is absurd and would instantly reduce the diversity of who can actually stand for Parliament. If we want a legislature of working class people rather than just trust fund kids who already own London homes, we have to let them rent a normal flat and not live in communal parliamentary housing which, let's be honest, would be a prime target for any terror plot...
It's been clear for sometime provided facilities would make much more sense
Cheaper accommodation, reduced transport costs, no wasted commuting time, and better security. It might even foster cross-party consensus on some of the more contentious issues.
Would just restrict the number of people who are able to stand as MPs.