A narrow win, 54% to 46%, on 39 votes with profiles attached — the kind of margin that flatters the winning side less than the raw count suggests. Yes carried the day, but only just, and the coalition behind it looks generationally lopsided.
The age data tells the sharper story. The 16-24 bracket backed acceleration by 7 votes to 2, and the 25-34 group tipped narrowly yes too (10-9), but the 35-44s swung hard against it, 4 no to 2 yes, while the two 45-54 voters were unanimous against. It is the young who want to move faster on climate, and the middle-aged who are pumping the brakes — a generational fault line that echoes the wider tension between net zero ambition and the near-term costs of getting there.
Gender cuts the same way but on a different axis: men backed the CCC's call for faster electrification 70% to 30%, women split the other way, 40% yes to 60% no. That is one of the widest gender gulfs this platform tends to throw up on an energy question, and it sits alongside the age divide rather than simply reinforcing it — younger men, in particular, look like the bloc that got Yes over the line.
A government looking for public appetite to go further on electrification will find it, on this evidence, concentrated in the young and the male — not exactly the broad coalition a national climate push usually needs.
0 Opinions
Weigh in on the debate.