AEBW

You want a Britain that polices two-tier justice hard, backs defence without hesitation, and refuses to let institutions patronise ordinary people — but you also think the financial sector has too much grip on the economy, that privatisation failed, and that inequality is corroding democracy. This isn't inconsistency; it's a coherent instinct that the system is rigged both culturally and economically, and both need correcting.

You split almost evenly with the national mood — agreeing on 20 of 30 recent votes — but the disagreements are pointed: you called Labour a threat to the Union when the country only narrowly agreed, and you back beavers, UBI and compulsory voting while dismissing Andy Burnham's "good growth" plan when most of Britain rejected it too. You're not a contrarian by habit; you just refuse a party line.

Your area votes with you almost every time — unanimous on the monarchy, on white British treatment, on two-tier justice, on UBI — making St Neots and Mid Cambridgeshire look like your echo, not your test. The rare local dissent (Shabana Mahmood, Ed Miliband as chancellor) shows even a sympathetic patch draws its own lines.

You've never voted on immigration, housing or employment — striking, given how loaded your justice and "second-class citizens" votes already are. That's the next place your profile needs filling in before anyone can call it complete.

This is early days on the numbers but a sharp shape already — cast a few more votes, especially on immigration and housing, and next week's read will cut even closer to the bone.