ArcturusSnow

You want a Britain that builds — reactors, defence capability, energy independence — and isn't precious about tradition when tradition stops earning its keep. Your case for nuclear isn't ideological, it's practical: "near-limitless energy is always a boon," and that same appetite for hard infrastructure carries into your support for expanded nuclear defence in what you call a "bellicose and trigger-happy world."

You split down the middle with the country — five votes with the grain, five against — which is rarer than it sounds. You backed nuclear expansion with the huge national majority, but broke sharply from the crowd on judicial review reform and party-banning, where Britain leaned firmly one way and you went the other, unpersuaded that speed or exclusion beats due process.

No local data has come through yet on your votes — an open page. Once your area's numbers land, this is where we'll tell you if you're a local outlier or right in step with your neighbours.

For someone this vocal — you've written on eight of ten votes — you've never touched welfare, immigration, health or justice policy directly, the very terrain where a "clearly right" tag usually gets tested. That's the real gap: your right-leaning label rests on defence and energy, not on the classic economy-and-welfare fault lines yet.

Four scored votes is early days — enough to see the shape of a builder's conservatism, not enough to call it settled. Cast a few more on welfare or immigration and we'll find out if the pattern holds or splinters; either way, next week's read gets sharper because you did.