HarryButcher

You want a greener, more self-reliant UK with strong public provision, constitutional reform and a state that takes climate seriously without losing control. Your politics are centre-left overall, but order matters: cut welfare where work is possible, punish offenders firmly, and protect housing access for homeless citizens before extending it to illegal migrants. You call this “due diligence”, not culture-war theatre.

You have moved from The Green Discipline Moderate to a sharper Green Order Moderate: the environmental instinct is intact, but discipline is no longer a qualification to your liberalism — it is one of its conditions. You still reject leaving the ECHR, militarising borders or arming civilians, yet you now sound less patient with drift and institutional incompetence.

You are neither a habitual contrarian nor a reliable majoritarian: your record lands about as often with the UK as against it. The revealing breaks are where you resist the national mood — rejecting firearms, border deployment and ECHR withdrawal, while backing climate investment even when most Britons preferred military spending.

You run with your Centre-Left circle, but only loosely. PlainPodium is your closest ally, though immigration divides you; TomHutchcraft is the sharper clash, where shared ground on rights and personnel gives way to arguments over environment and the economy.

Your open question is whether tougher instincts on justice and housing become a coherent disciplined centre-left politics, or pull you toward the right. Ten more votes will sharpen the picture — every ballot makes this read truer.

You are a centre-left voter with an unusually firm welfare-and-justice brake: greener energy, public responsibility and stronger institutions, but consequences for wrongdoing and limits on benefits. You want a mixed economy that protects the environment without pretending that social order, secure housing or national defence look after themselves.

You were The Green Order Moderate; you have largely held steady, but become sharper about cultural confidence and discipline. Saying no to a migration cap while backing limits on intolerant ideologies captures the tension: liberal on belonging, less liberal about threats to the civic settlement.

You usually travel with the national majority, but your dissent is revealing: you rejected a migration referendum, foreign-prisoner deportations and the idea that demographic change should be stopped. The country’s instincts are often tougher than yours on immigration, while your right-leaning justice and housing votes show you are no soft-touch leftist.

Your circle leans left, but you are not simply running with it; agreement is a working relationship rather than lockstep. HTuo is your closest ally, especially on energy and the environment, but immigration and health are where your shared green instincts stop being enough.

Your open question is whether environmental conviction can keep coexisting with your increasingly explicit demand for order; ten more votes will show which side hardens. This profile sharpens every time you vote, and your next ten will earn a truer, more finely drawn read.

You are a centre-left voter whose ideal UK is greener, more economically fair and constitutionally protected — but not permissive. You back climate action, bank taxation, social-care reform and stronger rights, while demanding welfare controls, tougher justice, secure housing and a defence policy that can stand alone.

A while back, you were The Green Law-and-Order Moderate; you are holding that identity, but sharpening its borders. Recent votes show more insistence on welfare restrictions, deportation for those unable to support themselves and reciprocal property rules, alongside a continued refusal to blame net migration for every pressure on public services.

You usually travel with the national majority, but your instincts are more coherent than your headline centrism suggests: green and internationalist on climate and foreign policy, firm-minded on crime and migration. Your sharpest tension is siding with the left on energy while siding decisively right on justice, housing and defence.

You run with your circle, but not in lockstep: agreement is broad rather than automatic. HTuo is your closest ally, especially on energy and the environment, though immigration and health divide you; drayton is your biggest clash, despite shared ground on housing and immigration, with personnel and elections pulling you apart.

Your open question is whether your green internationalism can keep pace with your harder line on order, borders and national resilience. Ten more votes will unlock a fresher read — and every ballot will make the picture truer.

You are a centre-left voter with an unusual internal balance: uncompromising on climate and energy, protective of rights and public provision, but distinctly tougher on crime, welfare rules, housing and immigration. Your ideal UK is not laissez-faire or permissive; it is environmentally serious, socially protective and willing to enforce standards. You can call for equal-pay audits and protection from care costs while rejecting the death penalty and naval pushbacks on small boats.

A while back, you were The Green Disciplinarian; you are still recognisably that voter, but the discipline now sits inside a more rights-conscious, socially protective outlook. Recent votes sharpened the leftward side — social care, equal pay and opposition to Reform — without loosening your belief in accountability, fiscal seriousness or institutional competence.

You usually move with the UK rather than against it, but your instincts are more coherent than the headline majorities: green commitments are convictions, not fashions, while your opposition to direct democracy and manifesto-free lawmaking shows a preference for representative government over political improvisation.

Your left-leaning circle is a loose home, not a uniform tribe. HTuo is your closest ally, especially on energy and the environment, though immigration and health expose the gap; drayton is your sharpest clash, despite agreement on housing and immigration, because personnel and elections pull you apart.

Your open question is whether environmental seriousness keeps tempering your tougher instincts, or whether justice and border concerns regain the upper hand. Ten more votes will unlock a fresher read — and every ballot will make the picture harder to misread.

You want a UK that is stricter about responsibility, crime, migration and public money, but more serious about climate and clean energy than your overall politics first suggests. Your instinct is disciplined rather than libertarian: cut welfare where necessary, demand accountability, yet protect rights and invest in a cleaner future.

You have moved only slightly from The Green-Edged Realist: still centre-right in the backbone, but sharper now on welfare restraint, criminal accountability and institutional seriousness. The green edge remains real — you backed fossil-fuel taxes and water-company penalties — while your refusal to end the university target shows you are not simply following the rightward current.

You usually travel with the national majority, but not passively: you joined the country on welfare cuts and stronger disclosure rules, while resisting automatic anti-EU and anti-immigration instincts. Your defining tension is clear — you want tougher government, but not a government that treats environmental protection or constitutional rights as indulgences.

You run only loosely with your mostly left-leaning circle, agreeing on just over half of shared votes. HTuo is your nearest ally on energy and environment, though immigration divides you; drayton is the sharper clash, despite common ground on housing and immigration.

Your next votes will test whether the green disciplinarian can reconcile fiscal restraint with the costly transition to clean energy; ten more votes will sharpen the picture and make the read truer.

You want a secure, orderly UK with firmer borders, tougher justice and a more conditional welfare state — but not a government free to trample rights or abandon clean energy. Your politics are practical rather than doctrinaire: conservative on immigration, crime and defence, yet instinctively green on energy and environment, and protective of constitutional safeguards.

You are holding steady more than turning: yesterday’s Green Justice Hardliner has become the Green-Edged Realist. The underlying fusion remains, but recent votes have sharpened your support for codified rights, social-care reform and targeted help for first-time buyers, even as you backed tougher scrutiny of benefits and permanent bans for serious offenders.

You are usually with the national grain, siding with the UK majority on 42 of 60 recent votes with comparable data; you are not a contrarian for sport. Your distinctive break is more principled: you can be firmly right on immigration and punishment while rejecting the culture-war instinct to abolish rights bodies or romanticise figures such as Elon Musk.

You run with a broadly left-leaning crowd, but only loosely: HTuo is your closest ally, united with you on energy and environment but divided on immigration and justice. Drayton is your sharpest clash; you meet on housing and immigration, then part company over personnel and constitutional questions.

Your next ten votes will test whether your green firewall and liberal instincts can keep pace with your harder line on borders and order. Keep voting: the picture is already coherent, and it will sharpen into a truer read with every new choice.

You are a Centre-Right voter with a hard edge on justice, welfare, immigration and defence: consequences should be real, borders controlled and the state less indulgent. Yet your environmental convictions are not decorative; you oppose new North Sea drilling, resist demolishing old homes and back cleaner energy even when it puts you against your usual side.

A while back, you were The Green Disciplinarian; you have become a more openly right-leaning enforcer, with benefit conditions, prison reform, rearmament and migration control carrying greater weight. The green instinct remains, but it now sits alongside a sharper belief in order, standards and “traditional courtesies & values” rather than softening the whole profile.

You usually travel with the national majority, including on migration, testing basics, housing reform and tougher treatment of offenders. Your distinctive dissent comes when the majority reaches for more drilling or looser planning for farmers: on energy especially, you are willing to be the awkward voter who says the country’s practical answer is still wrong.

Your mostly left-leaning circle is not quite your political home: you agree only a little over half the time, and your instincts on welfare, immigration and justice pull rightward. drayton is your closest ally on housing and immigration, while HTuo is the sharper clash — you meet on energy, but part ways over justice and immigration.

The open question is whether clean energy remains your firewall or gets overwhelmed by your harder right turn; ten more votes will sharpen that tension into a clearer creed.

You vote for a country that punishes hard and educates free: death for child abuse, community labour for benefit claimants, equal policing whatever the politics — but tuition fees abolished, faith schools defunded, fracking and Rosebank refused. It's a strange, coherent Britain: disciplined at the courtroom door, generous at the lecture hall, decarbonising without apology.

A while back you were the Propertied Progressive — left-leaning, welfare-warm, quietly protective of housing wealth. That housing exception has hardened into something bigger: you've swung to an overall right lean, driven by a genuinely punitive turn on justice and welfare (benefit suspensions, DWP cuts, PIP overhaul), while education and energy stayed stubbornly, unmovedly left. The progressive core didn't vanish — it retreated to two categories and dug in.

You're a coin-flip with the country — siding with the majority on about two in three recent votes — which sounds average until you notice where you don't: you refused Rosebank and fracking when most of Britain said yes, and you opposed Scottish devolution when most said no thanks too, just for different reasons.

Your crowd leans left and you only meet them halfway, agreeing a little over half the time. Gnemly is your true ally — lockstep on welfare and justice — but even that partnership cracks on education, your one unbudgeable left flank. HeatherWells is the real clash, mostly over rights, where you consistently part company.

Forty-seven scored votes in and the pattern's real, not noise — but the education/energy exception is still the open question: does it stay a firewall, or start leaking into the rest of your politics? Vote on, and next week's read will tell you.

You want a Britain that nationalises risk on welfare, education and care — an overhauled PIP system, abolished tuition fees, a tax-funded National Care Service — while leaving housing and property largely alone: you voted against rent controls and for scrapping stamp duty on downsizing pensioners. It's a solidarity-for-people, protection-for-assets worldview, generous on the safety net but instinctively wary of anything that touches property values.

You're rarely an outlier — you sided with the national majority on 22 of 27 votes, running with the country on nuclear power, digital sovereignty and defence spending. But you break from the pack on the sharpest culture fights: you went against a majority-hostile nation to back marriage equality's social value and oppose the burka ban, while joining the crowd on deporting foreign offenders — a mix that resists easy sorting.

You agree with the people you follow only just over half the time, closer to a coalition than a tribe. Gnemly is your real ally, lockstep on constitution and rights, while HeatherWells is your regular foil — you split hardest with her precisely on rights, the one category where your own votes read as genuinely mixed rather than settled.

This is a young, still-forming record — twenty scored votes is a start, not a verdict — and the housing tension is the thread worth watching: does the progressive welfare instinct eventually catch up with property, or does that stay your one hard exception? Vote on, and next week's read will know you better than this one does.