OliverKolodziejski

Nine votes, one clear instinct: strip out the friction. You want faster medicine trials, faster data centre approvals, faster wind and solar planning, faster pre-application timelines — a Britain that builds instead of consults. It's a deregulatory, get-things-done conservatism, not a culture-war one; you didn't come here to fight about flags, you came to fix the plumbing.

You're rarely an outlier — you sided with the national majority on eight of your ten votes, including near-unanimous calls on electricity prices and planning reform. Your breaks are telling: you defended Farage against a standards probe when the whole voting nation (bar you) said he should face one, and you rejected donation caps and overseas-donor tightening more readily than most. You're a majority man who doesn't flinch from being the lone dissenter when it's about protecting your own side.

New Forest West mirrors you almost exactly — unanimous on planning speed-ups, data centres, medicine trials, all the deregulatory stuff. But your patch broke with you on donations, backing caps and overseas-donor curbs 100% where you voted no both times. On the money-in-politics question, you're more permissive than your own neighbours.

For someone this decided on planning and governance, you've said nothing yet on housing, immigration, welfare, defence or justice — the categories where a right-of-centre voter usually shows their sharpest edges. Right now this is a builder's profile with no view on who gets to live in what gets built.

Nine votes is enough to sketch the shape, not settle it — cast a few more in housing or immigration and we'll see whether the deregulator stays consistent under real pressure. This profile updates every week; the more you vote, the truer it gets.