SimonTatam

Ten votes in, and every scored one lands the same way: you want a Britain that widens the floor under people rather than narrows it — social housing standards enforced, PIP assessments loosened not tightened, care paid for collectively. This isn't scattergun leftism; it's a consistent instinct that welfare and housing are where the state proves itself.

You're often out of step, and you don't flinch from it — on tightening PIP assessments the nation voted 67% yes, you voted no; on stripping mild ADHD claimants of disability benefits, 86% said yes, you said no. Twice you sided with the country — the care service and the 10 Year Capital Plan — but your instinct is to hold the line when Britain wants to tighten, not loosen.

No local data has come through yet on any of your votes — an unusual gap, and one worth closing so we can tell you whether your estate agrees with you or whether you're a lone voice on your own street.

You've never voted on immigration, defence, justice, education or crime — for someone this decided on welfare and housing, that's a wide unmapped country. A vote on the ECHR or on policing would tell us whether your egalitarianism is a general worldview or specifically a welfare-state one.

Eight scored votes is early days — enough to see the shape, not yet enough to call you distinctive. Cast a few more, especially outside welfare and housing, and this profile will sharpen fast — come back next week and see who you've become.