The state pension triple lock guarantees annual increases by the highest of earnings growth, inflation, or 2.5%. In April 2026 the pension rose 4.1% under the mechanism. The policy now costs around £130 billion a year and is projected to rise sharply as the population ages.
The chamber voted 33-21 to axe the triple lock for inflation-only uprating, a solid if not overwhelming majority given the size of the sums involved — £130bn a year and rising with the demographics.
The real story is age, not the aggregate. Younger cohorts were emphatic: 18 of 20 in the 25-34 bracket, and 5 of 7 16-24s, voted yes, treating the mechanism as an intergenerational bill they'll be paying long after today's pensioners have banked their 4.1%. Voters in their late 40s and 50s pushed the other way — the 45-54 group was unanimous against (4 of 4), and 55-64s broke 8-4 for keeping it, the classic pre-retirement constituency defending the guarantee just before it pays out for them.
That split maps neatly onto the wider tax-and-spend argument now surrounding an ageing population: those decades from drawing a pension are readier to trade its generosity for fiscal restraint than those approaching the line. Gender added a milder shift in the same direction, with women here slightly more pro-reform (78% yes) than men (57%), though on smaller numbers.
It is less a verdict on pensioner poverty than a dividing line between who pays for the lock and who is about to cash it in.
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
Is Robert Jenrick right that long-term welfare harms young people rather than supporting them?
Welfare · 294 votes · 74% voted Yes
Should in-work benefits be replaced with a higher minimum wage?
Welfare · 292 votes · 53% voted Yes
1.3 million foreign nationals claim universal credit in the UK, is this fair?
Welfare · 316 votes · 69% voted No
Should UK spending be refocused on investment in infrastructure and services instead of working-age benefits levels?
Welfare · 307 votes · 80% voted Yes
Should those that have been out of work for a year be forced to do 20 hours community service?
Welfare · 281 votes · 62% voted Yes
2 Opinions
Pensions policy should be reviewed and a graduated payment based on total income as many pensioners already have generous private pension provisions.
Fully agreed with this one, it's a shame every party seems to want to keep the lock