Are net zero targets damaging Britain’s economy?
EconomyEnds 24 Oct 20h 39m left

Are net zero targets damaging Britain’s economy?

The UK is legally committed to net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 under the Climate Change Act 2008, as amended in 2019, with five-year carbon budgets setting binding caps. The Climate Change Committee estimates the net cost at about 0.2% of GDP a year, while a 2026 industry report put the net zero economy at £105bn of GVA and 1.1m jobs. The Conservatives pledged in October 2026 to repeal the Act, arguing it raises costs, while the government says energy bills are high because of fossil fuel exposure rather than net zero.

Jump to opinions· 6
Cast your vote81 votes so far

Vote to unlock the result — plus the full breakdown by age, gender, constituency and political leaning.

DocketAlso on today's ballot
Debate

6 Opinions

Sign in and vote to share your opinion.
The Unifier
Voted noLeft lean

I feel that time has been wasted by manufacturing not trying hard enough to adapt to not just climate change, but also the items that are polluting the planet. Of course it will cost more to start with, the overall benefits are worth it, it will get cheaper. We have so much waste that could be turned into energy, get those furnaces built. Think positive, speed up.

The Constitutional Democrat
Voted noLeft lean

Not only does it add new jobs to the economy, it also attracts investors into new technology, opens up routes of genuine interest to start-ups looking to capitalise on innovating green energy, AND it helps us to move completely away from the global energy market. That will save us vast amounts of money considering that the main cause of the cost of living crisis is the energy crisis affecting the global energy markets. Energy independence is worth a small surcharge of 0.2%.

The Property-and-Custom Right
Voted yesRight lean

Energy costs made UK least competitive economy in terms of production. Increased inflation and partially created costs of living crisis. We never achieve these targets, but if by some catastrophic events we will, it will change nothing. Damaging is not strong enough, destroying ifits better.

Bearcage· 336
The Thrifty Sovereigntist
Voted yesRight lean

Of course they are, it adds costs to UK business and consumers, whilst the save on emissions is negligible when considered in comparison to china’s increase.

Chard· 229
The Red Housing Steward
Voted noH. Left lean

“Would you like to not have to pay bills anymore?” “Well, I quite like paying bills, actually!” Edited

The Public-Service Democrat
Voted noH. Left lean

The pollution, drought, heatwaves, more severe storms, flooding and other effects of NOT doing it are going to be a whole lot worse.