REFNATION
WelfareEnds 21 Sept 21h 7m left

Can the UK afford to keep welfare spending on its current trajectory?

UK welfare spending, including pensions and benefits, stands at around £334 billion in 2025/26 and is forecast to reach £409 billion by 2030/31, or 11.2% of GDP. The main drivers are an ageing population with the triple lock on state pensions and sharp rises in health-related claims, with disability caseloads projected to increase by millions. Total public spending is expected to remain around 44% of GDP while the budget deficit falls gradually over the next five years.

Jump to opinions· 5
Cast your vote54 votes so far

Vote to unlock the result — plus the full breakdown by age, gender, constituency and political leaning.

DocketAlso on today's ballot
Debate

5 Opinions

Sign in and vote to share your opinion.
JoeKimi· 24
The Agenda-Setter
Voted noC. Right lean

I'm sick of being a PAYE pig to pay for people who don't contribute or have gold plated pensions. I have nothing left to cut back on.

The Firm-Border Pragmatist
Voted noC. Right lean

Welfare spending is both unaffordable and escalating, we need to break people’s reliance on welfare and get them to be productive members if society, working and paying taxes.

Jonathan· 381
The Civic Gatekeeper
Voted noRight lean

Break the addiction to money for nothing.

r08yn· 264
The Civic Ownership Left
Voted yesLeft lean

Excluding pensions (since the triple lock keeps them moving with inflation). Yeah, they definitely can given how taxes work; money paid to benefit claimants stays in the economy and their spending boosts GDP because they spend every pound they get rather than saving it. Is the government doing enough to create job opportunities? Hell no.

Akz99· 233
The Market-Humanist
Voted noC. Left lean

We need wide ranging reforms to both the pension and benefits system. There are clearly people who actually cannot work and deserve a lot better lives than they're being afforded by the welfare state. Similarly, there are many people abusing the system for trivial matters which don't actually prevent them from working. Pensions should be means tested to provide a safety net for those who need it to survive.