Should the UK replace unemployment benefit with a guaranteed 8 hours a week at minimum wage?
WelfareEnds 26 Oct 21h 51m left

Should the UK replace unemployment benefit with a guaranteed 8 hours a week at minimum wage?

Unemployed people in the UK mainly claim Universal Credit, whose standard allowance is £424.90 a month for a single person aged 25 or over in 2026/27, or new-style Jobseeker's Allowance at £95.55 a week. Eight hours at the £12.71 National Living Wage would pay about £101.68 a week, close to the basic allowance but without housing or child elements. The government's Jobs Guarantee, going national from November 2026, offers 18-24s who have been on Universal Credit for 18 months a six-month job of up to 25 hours a week at minimum wage, alongside rather than instead of benefits.

Jump to opinions· 5
Cast your vote59 votes so far

Vote to unlock the result — plus the full breakdown by age, gender, constituency and political leaning.

DocketAlso on today's ballot
Debate

5 Opinions

Sign in and vote to share your opinion.
Bearcage· 344
The Thrifty Sovereigntist
Voted yesRight lean

The country needs to generate thousands of useful jobs that those claiming unemployment must do to receive benefits and remain useful members of society, rather than staying unemployed long term.

Rabbit90· 461
The Governing Nationalist
Voted yesRight lean

Hitler's Germany managed to create work for the unemployed, but we in a liberal democracy for some reason just give them small amounts of money, harangue them to find work somehow and do nothing to create jobs.

BenL· 552
THE NANNY-STATE ALLERGIC
Voted noC. Left lean

I don't really understand how this would be implemented... Creating and supervising millions of fake 8 hour a week state jobs across the country would cost far more in administrative bureaucracy than it saves in benefits.

Jonathan· 645
The Institution
Voted yesH. Right lean

It's time they sang for their supper.