Andy Burnham's 10-year mission fell well short on refnation, with 35 of 56 votes against and yes managing only 38 per cent — a clear if not crushing defeat, closer to a rejection of the package than a wipeout.
The number that jumps out is gender, not age. Men split almost down the middle, 19 yes to 22 no (46 per cent), essentially a coin-toss on devolution, welfare cuts and reindustrialisation. Women who voted were unanimous the other way: all seven said no, not one backing the plan.
Age tells a subtler story. The 25-34 bracket, the only age group with real numbers, was the closest thing to a yes constituency at 45 per cent, while 35-44s were the most hostile at just 22 per cent — a squeeze on the plan from the generation often assumed to want higher welfare spending and softer bills most, cutting against the "reindustrialisation for the middle-aged" framing Burnham's team might have hoped for.
It leaves Burnham's platform looking like classic mayoral-to-national politics: popular enough among men to survive a hustings, but nowhere close to winning over the female vote it will need if it ever leaves the conference hall.
0 Opinions
Weigh in on the debate.