REFNATION
TransportNationalClosed · Final

Should HS2 be extended to Manchester?

Yes 56%No 44%483 votes cast

The northern leg of HS2 from Birmingham to Manchester was cancelled in 2023 due to spiralling costs on Phase 1, now estimated between £87.7bn and £102.7bn with services delayed until at least 2036. In 2026 the government under Prime Minister Andy Burnham is studying a scaled-down 'HS2 lite' alternative using some retained land and existing powers, potentially integrated with Northern Powerhouse Rail to ease capacity on the West Coast Main Line.

Jump to opinions· 20

“Stopping HS2 halfway is like building half a bridge” captured the winning argument: cancellation would leave the West Coast Main Line’s northern bottleneck intact. Yes carried the vote by a clear but not overwhelming margin, in a self-selected online ballot rather than a poll of the UK.

The floor’s most-respected Yes cases were practical rather than starry-eyed. One argued that HS2 “doesn't fix the bottleneck that is the West Coast Mainline North of Birmingham”; another asked whether it was time the scheme was finally “got on with”. Even supporters often sounded like reluctant shareholders trying to salvage value from a troubled investment.

No voters, meanwhile, made the cost overruns the central fact. Their strongest case called it “a blank cheque for a late, bloated railway”, while another dismissed it as a “Pointless vanity project”. The two sides largely talked past each other: Yes warned that doing nothing meant overcrowded trains, No that continuing meant throwing good money after bad.

That tension places the result inside the wider argument over whether northern growth is best served by ambitious new infrastructure or by repairing what already exists. The vote’s more revealing qualification was that several Yes voices demanded a “radical overhaul” of how the project is planned and delivered; support for Manchester was not a vote of confidence in the machinery behind HS2.

The route won the room; HS2 itself did not receive a clean bill of health.

LeftCentreRight
56%
Yes · 271 votes
44%
No · 212 votes
Yes No
By gender
Male
59/41
Female
48/52
By age
16–24
62/38
25–34
79/21
35–44
60/40
45–54
57/43
55–64
56/44
65+
47/53
By political leaning
H. Left
93/7
Left
69/31
C. Left
76/24
Centre
78/22
C. Right
65/35
Right
43/57
H. Right
21/79
Spread the wordShare
Debate

20 Opinions

Sign in and vote to share your opinion.
The Anti-Bloc Socialist
Voted yesLeft

The failure of HS2 is a failure of the free market, first and foremost, as is the case with most UK infrastructure projects. Private construction firms suck every last drop of money from the government and the taxpayer, rather than focusing on delivering results. HS2 should be continued and expanded, but only under strict state oversight and management.

Spargrass· 159
The Work-and-Order Custodian
Voted noCentre Right

Poorly thought out, badly implemented and sadly caused unnecessary chaos and loss for many whilst enriching a few. Should've got the French in to show how its done on quiet wheels !?

The Market-State Traditionalist
Voted noRight

No. The costs are astronomical and there is no guarantee it would produce different results. Phase 1 has already doubled and slipped. Northern growth matters. A blank cheque for a late, bloated railway does not. Fix what we have and prove the case before we extend a project that has already broken its promises.

Ferris· 88
The Devolved Gatekeeper
Voted noCentre Right

When are politicians actually going to start carrying out due diligence before embarking on their vanity projects?

Elkay0405· 202
The Centre-Right Leveller
Voted yesCentre

I support investment in infrastructure, trying to upgrade our inadequate transport systems. BUT, whole process needs radical overhaul. Need to be more authoritarian in execution. Once route decided, no more NIMBY, delays for Great Crested Newts, building hedgehog tunnels. Selection of Contractors with penalties for failing to deliver stages they signed up to. Otherwise it becomes a typical money pit, years of delays and multiple project cost overrun. Get on with it!

Glasses· 445
The Public-Order Traditionalist
Voted noRight

Pointless vanity project. Doesn't save any time and costs too much. Doing all this when lots of commuters are starting to work from home. Not needed.

JohnnyBoy· 232
The Administrative Absolutist
Voted yesHard Right

HS2 was always a scam only showing that as a Nation our Public Sector is not fit for purpose & irredeemably corrupt; however the Northern parts should have always been the priority. The lies the Civil Service told to justify £Billions to shave 10/15 minutes off a trip to Brum are up there with COVID-19 was a ‘Pandemic’ ( cos we secretly changed the definition). Northern link will make economic sense, but government should but out.

DanielW· 101
The Fiscal Sovereigntist
Voted noRight

No, and I would have never started it in the first place. The cost/benefit ratio was never beneficial given the relatively small distance between the cities.

The Social Covenant Keeper
Voted noCentre

We should just cut our losses at this point, HS2 has been a total disaster

The Peacemaker
Voted noLeft

NO HS2 was a pointless exercise in chest thumping in the first place. Billions spent to save an elite few, a couple of minutes on a train journey from London to Birmingham. The money wasted on HS2 could have made vast improvements in travel times for many millions of citizens daily travel if it had been spent on improving the current road & rail infrastructure we already had. The same applies to the Birmingham to Manchester section of HS2