Should the UK ban all trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank?
Foreign PolicyEnded 9 Sept

Should the UK ban all trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank?

Yes 45%No 55%676 votes cast

The UK regards Israeli settlements in the West Bank as illegal under international law and has issued sanctions on some settler networks involved in violence. As of September 2026 the government under Prime Minister Andy Burnham and Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband is expected to announce a ban on trade in goods and some services from these settlements, framed as a reset in UK-Israel relations amid settlement expansion in areas like E1.

Jump to opinions· 35

The floor’s most-respected No voices made the vote a test of consistency rather than a referendum on Israel alone. One put it bluntly: “Trade is a business transaction and should hold no relevance to sanctions”; another asked, “Are we going to do the same to Iran”, demanding that any moral policy explain its selectivity.

The Yes case was narrower and more legally focused. Its strongest formulation was: “If settlements are illegal under international law, trading with them makes us complicit in theft”, with the argument that support for a two-state solution cannot coexist with commerce that sustains the settlements.

No voters answered that logic with practical doubts as well as political suspicion. One argued that a ban would affect Palestinian livelihoods because West Bank companies include businesses “many of whom employ Palestinians”, while others said the measure would do little to change events on the ground.

That left the two sides talking past each other over consistency. No voters pointed to wider abuses — “We trade with China who use Uyghur slave labour” — while Yes voters insisted, “It's not the same as banning trade with the State of Israel”, because the proposal targeted settlements rather than the Israeli state.

The room did not settle whether trade is chiefly commerce or leverage. It did settle which concern carried further: a selective sanction looked less like principled law enforcement than political choice.

“If settlements are illegal under international law, trading with them makes us complicit in theft. You can't claim to support a two state solution while economically bankrolling the very enterprise destroying it.”

YES case · BenL · 4 respects

“Are we going to do the same to Iran who have openly killed their own citizens for asking for freedom to speak and dress as they choose ? At least 6500 people killed - probably in tens of thousands - since December 2025. I realise this is whataboutery which is irritating but Labour do seem to choose their sanctions carefully so as to not antagonise what they feel are their voters…”

NO case · Estella · 7 respects

55%
No
majority
45% Yes
Votes676
Skipped16
You—

% voting yes, by leaning

100% yes among H. Left voters, 36 of them
98% yes among Left voters, 87 of them
88% yes among C. Left voters, 75 of them
77% yes among Centre voters, 61 of them
43% yes among C. Right voters, 93 of them
12% yes among Right voters, 259 of them
0% yes among H. Right voters, 81 of them
H. Left
Left
C. Left
Centre
C. Right
Right
H. Right
Early result

This referendum settled before 29 September 2026, when refnation's current method began, so its result is a plain count of Yes and No. It is kept here as an archive: refnation's record starts on 29 September 2026.

How results are calculated, and corrections

Spread the wordShare
Debate

35 Opinions

Sign in and vote to share your opinion.
Estella· 554
The Iron Householder
Voted noH. Right lean

Are we going to do the same to Iran who have openly killed their own citizens for asking for freedom to speak and dress as they choose ? At least 6500 people killed - probably in tens of thousands - since December 2025. I realise this is whataboutery which is irritating but Labour do seem to choose their sanctions carefully so as to not antagonise what they feel are their voters…

The Fiscal Plain-Speaker
Voted noRight lean

We trade with China who use Uyghur slave labour, we trade with Argentina which invaded and killed our people. This ban has nothing to do with actually helping palestinians and everything to do with appeasing the Labour / LibDem / Green pro-pally lobby in the UK As for a helping 2 state solution, the Palestinians don't want it and have rejected it every time it was offered, as Bill Clinton and Hosni Mubarak made explicitly clear

The Hearth-and-Ledger Conservative
Voted noRight lean

Trade is a business transaction and should hold no relevance to sanctions which are politically motivated. Two separate issues.

JohnnyBoy· 591
The Freeholder Insurgent
Voted noRight lean

Islam has invaded murdered raped & enslaved all the Middle East countries surrounding Israel yet the mantra that it is a religion of peace is fraudulently parroted. Let’s ban all trade from Islamic countries who veil their women execute those who leave the cult & export their low IQ goat herders to UK. It’s pure anti-Semitism & a deflection from Hamas being a bunch of depraved murdering thugs. Labour’s friends of course. Shameful it will be Burnham’s FAFO moment.

Glasses· 825
The Command-and-Control Right
Voted noRight lean

We rely on Israel for intelligence into terrorism in UK. Absolutely stupid .Milliband wants to trash ,ruin, bankrupt our country. Most dangerous man in Britain

The Fiscal Custodian
Voted noRight lean

Israel gave up Gaza then moved back after Hamas ruined it. Now they're moving back into the West Bank because it's ruined too. The two state solution is over. "Palestine" had its chance and blew it. Again. Meanwhile we're banning their avocados. How infantile our geopolitics are.

Fletch· 594
Dieu et mon Droit
Voted noRight lean

I do not believe a trade ban will make a difference. Yes Israel has questions to answer but there again so do Hamas and their apologists. The UK has zero strategic say in the middle east which on the whole is a peaceable area bar a few hot-spots.

Dragontao· 567
The Bright-Line Householder
Voted noC. Right lean

This will also hurt Palestinian workers. Many have jobs with Israeli companies within the West Bank, not to mention increase some costs in the UK. Call me a cynic, but I don't think it's a coincidence that these sanctions have been taken ahead of the Holborn and St Pancras by-election where Labour will be battling the Greens for the Islamic vote and not wanting a defeat in their first real test since Burnham was crowned, especially in such a high profile seat.

The Border-and-Order Mandarinate
Voted noRight lean

The terrorist settlement of palestine is a occupation and has been since the Jews were forced out of Judea. The Labour Party don't care about Israel, Israelis or Jews. They have done this to keep voters and put the UK closer to the war they want. The British Empire has given back the land it occupied so why can't the islamists?

Jonathan· 629★
The Institution
Voted noH. Right lean

If we ban trade with West Bank companies, many of whom employ Palestinians, we should ban trade with companies in Xinjiang, all of which enslave Uyghurs.