A_CryptoDude

You want a country run from the ground up: councils deciding their own housing plans, no centrally imposed frameworks stretching thirty years ahead, no state power to outlaw parties by decree. Yours is a Britain suspicious of grand architecture — you'd rather trust local judgement than a national blueprint, even when that means turning down tidy-sounding reform.

You sided with the national majority on eight of ten recent votes, but your two breaks are telling — you opposed banning extremist parties when most voters wanted a ban rejected too (so no real tension there), and you backed a health and social care plan the country liked while much of the harder right of your profile pulled the other way. That's the seam in you: hard-right on planning and welfare, but not reflexively hostile to state intervention in health.

No local data has come through yet on any of your votes — early days, so this section stays open until your area starts registering opinions alongside you.

You've never voted on immigration, the economy, justice or education — big absences for someone this decided on housing and planning. Given how sharply you lean on spatial control, an economy or immigration vote would likely sharpen this profile fast rather than soften it.

Eight scored votes is enough to see the shape of you, not yet enough to be sure of it — cast a few more, especially somewhere unexpected like immigration or justice, and next week's read will cut closer to the bone. This profile updates every time you vote — think of it as a conversation, not a verdict.