AnnieB

You want a Britain that holds the line: on housing, that means resisting fresh council-home expansion and Strategic Partnership top-ups rather than pouring more public money into social housing; on welfare and justice, it means judges with less discretion and no easy raising of National Insurance to soften the state pension age. This is a vision of restraint — a country that fixes problems by tightening rules, not loosening purse-strings.

On seven of ten recent votes you landed with the national majority — you're no outlier, you're the mainstream right flank of a country that, on nuclear deterrence and sentencing discretion, largely agrees with you. But you broke from the crowd on housing investment and Strategic Partnership funding, where most who voted wanted the state to do more and you didn't, and on social media misinformation, where you sided left with the majority wanting companies held legally responsible — a rare left-leaning vote in an otherwise right-coded record.

No local data has come through yet for your area, so there's no read on whether your neighbours share your instincts — an open thread for future votes to fill in.

You've never voted on economy, education, defence, or immigration beyond a single Home Office question — for someone this decided on housing and justice, whole fault lines like tax-and-spend and the ECHR remain untested ground.

This is early days — seven scored votes is a sketch, not a portrait. Cast a few more, especially in the gaps above, and we'll sharpen this into a fuller picture next week.