DianaHarding

You vote for a UK that balances its books, protects its borders and stands confidently outside the EU’s orbit. Your strongest convictions are fiscal restraint, national defence and constitutional sovereignty: “financially secure our country above others,” without trusting government to meddle in markets. It is early days for the finer distinctions, but the direction is unmistakable.

You were THE UNBENDING UNIONIST; you are now a sharper fiscal constitutionalist, adding ECHR withdrawal, welfare cuts and budget discipline to the older instincts about sovereignty and defence. Yet you have not hardened into a simple culture-war voter: you reject civilian firearms and forced loss of dual citizenship, and still resist direct democracy when it looks careless or unrepresentative.

You usually move with the national majority — on 25 of 32 votes — but your reasons are more disciplined than the crowd’s mood. You backed the nation on borders, welfare and the deficit, while opposing wealth taxes, fossil-fuel levies and a return to the EU; your one clear leftward reflex is that citizenship need not demand cultural surrender.

Your Centre-Right circle is a useful ally, not a political home: you agree 62% of the time, enough for shared instincts but not lockstep. You run with them on sovereignty and restraint, while your market suspicion of state direction and selective social liberalism leave you independently minded.

Your next ten votes will test whether this becomes a settled hard-edged conservatism or remains a pragmatic, business-minded right; the picture sharpens every time you vote.

Every scored vote you've cast points the same way — right, and firmly so: drill the North Sea, keep the state out of pension funds, keep the monarchy, keep the forces out of Pride. You're not chasing novelty; you want a leaner state, a stronger union, and institutions left alone to do their actual jobs — as you put it, sexuality "has nothing to do with defence of the nation."

You split evenly with the national mood — right there with the 73% who backed North Sea drilling, but out on a limb against a country that mostly wants England's independence question aired and pension funds nudged toward Britain; you called that fund idea a coming "misselling scandal" waiting to happen, and you'd scrap devolution outright rather than referendum it into being.

You run with a Centre-Right crowd but keep your own counsel — agreeing with them only a little over six times in ten, and even your closest match, matmini, splits from you squarely on the constitution. This isn't herd politics; it's conviction that happens to sit near the herd.

Only five scored votes in, but the line is already unmistakable — early days, sharp shape. Cast a few more and this profile will start finding the edges even you haven't named yet; check back next week and see how firmly they hold.