JulesB

You want a Britain that keeps the state out of the boardroom and off the balance sheet — private utilities, business rates trimmed, no more "public control" romanticism. But your rightism has no interest in defending the powerful for its own sake: you rejected the idea the right dominates media or has a violence problem, and backed IRGC and FSB crackdowns without hesitation. This is muscular, unsentimental economic conservatism, not tribal loyalty.

You're often the lone no in a room saying yes. Britain wanted public control of utilities and more bank holidays; you didn't. You're not contrarian for sport — you simply don't buy the comfortable consensus when it costs the economy money.

No local data has caught up with you yet — every comparison here has been against the nation alone. That's a gap worth closing.

You've never voted on welfare, housing, energy, justice or the constitution — a striking silence for someone this decided on economics. Your GP-strike and visa votes hint at a soft-left streak on health and immigration that the rest of your record hasn't tested yet.

Ten votes in and you're already a genuinely rare shape — right-coded but not reflexively so. Vote on welfare or housing next and we'll see whether that health-and-immigration streak is a real seam or a one-off. Every vote sharpens this; come back and we'll show you who you're becoming.