MC_Turtle

You want a leaner Britain: no council-house building sprees, no Home Office defiance from town halls, no NI hikes to soften the retirement age. Twice you were asked to fund more social housing and twice you said no — that's not an accident, that's a conviction. Pair it with wanting judges stripped of leniency for repeat offenders, and the shape is clear: a state that punishes more and provides less.

You're out of step more often than in it, and not quietly — Britain voted 63% and 48% for expanding social housing investment, you voted no both times; the country split on Home Office cooperation, you were firmly against; even the mildly popular junk-food ad ban lost you. Where you do meet the nation is on sentencing — 68% of Britain agrees with you there.

Your area isn't just aligned with you, it's a mirror — every recorded local vote landed exactly where you did, from housing to social media liability to the road tax you broke ranks on yourself (you went left on EV mileage tax, against the grain of the national no-vote spread). That one dissent is worth noting: you're not a reflexive right-winger, you picked a fight with your own instincts there.

Eight scored votes is a start, not a verdict — you've said nothing yet on the economy, defence, education, or the constitution, the terrain where a "hard right" label usually gets tested hardest.

This is early days — a sharp, thin sketch of a man who trusts punishment over provision. Cast a few votes on tax, defence or education and we'll find out if that instinct holds under real pressure — the picture gets truer every week you show up.