Mjwg

Ten votes in, and the shape is already unmistakable: this is a Britain that leaves the European Convention on Human Rights, keeps its nuclear deterrent, scraps net zero, and pulls up the drawbridge on immigration. You said no to a state housebuilder and no to UBI — the state builds walls and armies, not homes or handouts, in your version of the country.

You're not a maverick — you sided with the national majority on nine of your ten votes, from Brexit-adjacent instincts on human rights law to scepticism on Starmer's record. The one break is telling: on threatening to shoot an MP, the country voted 89% for arrest and you didn't. That's not softness on crime elsewhere — you want the death penalty back — so it reads less like sympathy and more like a discomfort with where that particular line gets drawn.

No local data has come through yet on any of your votes, so there's nothing to set against your own backyard — a gap worth closing the moment your area starts voting alongside you.

You've cast opinions on Europe, drugs and the death penalty but never touched welfare, health, justice, or the economy directly — for someone this decisive, that's a lot of the state left unvoted on.

Two scored votes is barely a sketch of a worldview, however sharp the sketch looks — vote on welfare, health or the economy next and this profile stops guessing and starts knowing exactly who you are.