Pedwar1943

You want a Britain that redistributes hard — wealth taxed, council homes rebuilt, the benefit cap gone — but you're no pacifist about it: defence spending and even a mileage tax on electric cars get your yes, because for you the state's job is to fund things properly, full stop.

Last time you were the Sanctuary Hardliner, softened everywhere except one line on policing for Jewish communities. That precise edge hasn't resurfaced here, but the shape holds — still unanimous left on welfare, immigration, housing — with the old exception now generalised into a broader comfort with the state spending big on security and infrastructure alike.

You split with the country almost exactly down the middle, matching the majority on steel and the pension triple lock but standing apart on whole-life sentences and Pride in the forces, where the nation swung right and you didn't move.

You run well with Wazzock, in step eight times out of ten on how elections should work, but you're at odds with lixhul more often than not, especially where rights and personnel are the argument — proof your hard left convictions aren't inherited, they're worked out alone.

Keep voting — environment, tech and culture are still blank pages in your record, and every choice you make sharpens this picture into something truer than today's read.

You want a Britain that keeps its promises — the NHS rebuilt not dismantled, refugee reunion restored, a Hillsborough Law that finally makes power answerable. Across justice, welfare and immigration your record is close to unanimous: state protects, state provides, state is held to account.

Last week you were "The Old Left Loyalist" — the label still fits the bones, but the picture has sharpened. The £250m for police protecting Jewish communities isn't a stray right-leaning vote, it's a pattern: your left convictions come with a hard edge on communal safety that a simple "loyalist" tag missed.

You split with the country almost exactly down the middle — siding with the majority on NHS reform and police leadership, but standing well apart on the burka ban (you said no while two-thirds of Britain said yes) and on deporting foreign offenders, where you refused the 80% national consensus outright.

Coventry East, at least in this small sample, moves with you almost every time — unanimous on childcare, devolution, transport contracts. The one break is instructive: your area voted against the Jewish-community policing spend even as you voted for it, the rare moment you're more hawkish than home.

You've never voted on environment, transport infrastructure, culture or technology — for a man this decided on the state's duties to people, the state's duties to the planet and the future remain untested ground. Cast a vote on any of those and this profile gets truer by the week — that's the whole point of coming back.

You are the Britain of collective provision: nationalise the risk, tax the wealth, protect the wage packet. You voted against reforming welfare into "employment support," against letting the minimum wage take blame for job losses, and called out CEOs paying themselves hundreds of times their workers' wage as simply wrong. This is a settled worldview, not a reaction — it's the postwar settlement, still standing guard.

You split almost exactly down the middle with the country — siding with the majority half the time — but the pattern beneath that is telling. Where the nation swung right on crime, immigration integration tests, or defence-over-welfare, you held the left line every time; where you broke from the left script, it was on oddities like CANZUK or Reform UK's danger to Britain, not on the bread-and-butter fights.

Your single-voter sample from Coventry East agrees with you almost unanimously — mansion tax, wealth tax, solar subsidies, all yes — making you less an outlier locally than a fairly faithful echo of it. The one place you split from your own patch was medicines and cars, small stuff against a backdrop of near-total alignment.

You've never voted on environment, culture, or technology — odd omissions for someone this decided on economics, since the green subsidy vote suggests real sympathy waiting to be tested further.

This is early but sharp: 38 scored votes already draw a clear line, and every vote from here sharpens the picture rather than starting it over. Cast a few on environment or infrastructure and we'll see whether your welfare-state instincts extend to the planet too.