TraceyPhillips

You want a Britain run like a household budget — value for money on pensions, a defence force judged on readiness not spend, no blank cheques for a National Care Service. But you're not a doctrinaire cutter: you backed council housing expansion and voted yes on a birthright savings fund, so the instinct is careful stewardship, not austerity for its own sake.

On ten votes you sided with the national majority seven times — you're no outlier. But where you diverge, it's telling: you rejected the Care Service and the housing partnership top-up that most of the country waved through, and you voted with the overwhelming national no on Lewisham's Home Office ban. You're a majority voter with a sceptic's veto.

No local data has come through yet on any of your votes — so there's no read on whether your town backs you or breaks from you. That's the first gap worth closing.

Seven scored votes across just two real categories is thin ground — you've never voted on health, justice, energy, defence policy proper, or the economy at large. Immigration and environment show only a single vote each, both unanimously right — promising signals, not yet patterns.

This is early days: a Centre-Right lean with a genuine independent streak on housing and pensions, but not enough volume yet to call it a fixed identity. Cast a few more — especially somewhere with local data attached — and next week's profile will start telling you something sharper about who you really are.